Ewing v. Root
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 5, 1962 143 So. 2d 396; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 2, 1962 136 So. 2d 176; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 6, 1930 128 So. 188; La., July 15, 1876 28 La. Ann. 843
Ewing v. Root, 21 La. Ann. 683 (1869).
Opinion text
IIowel, J. The defendant, Elias Lindstrum, has appealed from a judgment on default against him, rendered upon three promissory notes, amounting to $1500 exclusive of interest. In his brief he urges that he has a good defense, but no sufficient reason is shown why a defense could not have been made in the Court below. The proceedings are all regular, and more than the usual legal delays occurred before judgment by default was made final, which is fully sustained by the evidence. The appellee has prayed for damages, which, under the circumstances presented in the record, must be allowed. It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be affirmed, with one hundred dollars damages and costs of suit in both courts.