DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bell v. Holdcraft, 196 So. 379.

21 citing documents.

  • Terra Builders v. International Paper Co. 445 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    an earlier decision of this court, in which a default judgment was set aside on appeal.
  • Brown v. Brown 430 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    542 (1898); In fact, counsel for Mr. Brown steadfastly contended both in brief and at oral argument that “[w]e do not contend that the judgment making past due alimony [execu-tory] was obtained by fraud or il
  • Murray v. Housing Authority of St. Charles Parish 425 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Appellant urges that mistake as to representation is a valid ground for annulment of a default judgment in Louisiana, (La.App.
  • Hunt v. Walker 347 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    2nd Cir. 1966); (La.App.
  • Roy v. Griffith 306 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1974
    542 (1898); ” From our review of Roy v. Griffith, supra, we are satisfied that the Court of Appeal did not consider the implication of the endorsements on the checks of January 11, 1971, and there is nothing i
  • Young v. Warner 283 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    100 (Orl.App.1934); (2nd La.App.1940).
  • Muller v. Michel Lecler Inc. 266 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
  • Community Construction Co. v. Scott 235 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    4th Cir. 1963); (La.App.
  • Pertuit v. LeBlanc 216 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    Mary (supra); Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App., ; Nessans v. Colomes, 130 La.
  • McKinney v. Levy 212 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    542 ; Weinberger Sales Co. v. Truett, La.App., ; .
  • Martin v. Eustis 192 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    The cases of Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App., , and Elchinger v. Lacroix, 192 La.
  • St. Mary v. St. Mary 175 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    2 Cir., , set aside a judgment which had been obtained when the defendant failed to present a valid defense because of his mistaken and not unreasonable impression that he had retained an attorney to represent him, as corroborated by surrounding circumstances.
  • Gumina v. Dupas 159 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    542 ; cf. Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App., ; Sandfield Oil & Gas Co., Inc. v. Paul, La.
  • Pfeiffer v. Hemisphere International Corporation 153 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    Co. v. Paul, La.App., ; Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App., .
  • Ardoin v. Robinson 129 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    A case strongly relied upon by appellant is Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App.2d Cir., 1940, , wherein this court granted a new trial.
  • Collins v. Rambo 123 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    2 Cir., 1940, ; McDaniels v. Doll, La.App.
  • Miller v. Rollins 111 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    Our attention is likewise directed to Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App.1940, , a decision by this court, and City of New Orleans v. LeBourgeois, 50 La.
  • Higginbotham v. Inland Empire Ins. 88 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    of 1921; Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App., .
  • Hasert v. Crumb 71 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    The appellant cites the case of Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App., , for his position that a remand of this canse is entirely within the discretion of this review* ing Court.
  • Woods v. William Rednour Transfer Storage Co. 3 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    In Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App., , appears the following: "An appeal will lie from a judgment rendered by default * * *".
  • Weinberger Sales Co. v. Truett 2 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    In such a situation, our brothers of the Second Circuit, , said: "We fail to see where appellant was guilty of any laches.