No. 61443 Precedential Processed

In re Carter

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed February 17, 1978 · 358 So. 2d 949

Cited by

In Re Succession of Horrell 993 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Smith v. Smith 796 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Taylor v. Johnson 532 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Sampson 498 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Goins v. Goins 437 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Le Blanc v. Le Blanc 404 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Faust v. Faust 385 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Kelly v. Village of Greenwood 363 So. 2d 887 La. 1978
Devall v. Devall 360 So. 2d 522 La. 1978

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

In re Carter 357 So. 2d 1175

Opinion text

In re: Wilford D. Carter, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus. Parish of Calcasieu. 357 So.2d 1175 . Writ denied. The contempt adjudication does not purport to prevent the relator from practicing before Division “F”. We find no error in the proceedings adjudicating the relator to have committed a direct contempt. However, the relator’s motion for a stay within which to apply to the United States Supreme Court is granted and execution of the sentence is stayed for 60 days for that purpose. DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., would grant. The judge who was recused in chambers, should have recused himself from the trial on contempt. CALOGERO, J., would grant on the recu-sal issue.