DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 362 So. 2d 536.

16 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Steven Ray Killingsworth La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
    We are also mindful of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s (La.
  • State v. Shaffer 77 So. 3d 939 La. 2011
    15:574.4(B) provides unequivocally that no inmate serving a life sentence shall be eligible for parole, parole consideration would be withheld from the defendant, by operation of law, despite the fact that the applicable penalty provision did not include the words “without benefit of parole.’ ”) ( , 539 n. 3 (La.1978)).
  • State v. Dyer 77 So. 3d 928 La. 2011
    15:574.4(33) provides unequivocally that no inmate serving a life sentence shall be eligible for parole, parole consideration would be withheld from the defendant, by operation of law, despite the fact that the applicable penalty provision did not include the words ‘without benefit of parole.’ ”)( , 539 n. 3 (La.1978)).
  • State v. Leason 77 So. 3d 933 La. 2011
    15:574.4(B) provides unequivocally that no inmate serving a life sentence shall be eligible for parole, parole consideration would be withheld from the defendant, by operation of law, despite the fact that the applicable penalty provision did not include the words ‘without benefit of parole.’ ”) ( , 539 n. 3 (La.
  • State v. Franks 55 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    We noted 12that any action taken by a recused judge is an “absolute nullity,” but that a recused judge may preside over a case if something subsequently occurs to “neutralize” the cause of recusation
  • Rainey v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 35 So. 3d 215 La. 2010
  • State v. Franks 975 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    However, held that a previously recused judge may preside over the trial if something occurs thereafter to "neutralize" the cause for recusation.
  • Bosworth v. Whitley 627 So. 2d 629 La. 1993
    539 n. 3 (La.1978); , 560 n. 11 (La.1985).
  • State v. Saddler 538 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Lewis 468 So. 2d 557 La. 1985
  • State v. Robinson 423 So. 2d 1053 La. 1982
  • State v. Littleton 395 So. 2d 730 La. 1981
  • State v. Manning 380 So. 2d 54 La. 1980
  • State v. Barthlomew 377 So. 2d 1233 La. 1979
    Therefore, the denial of “probation, parole or suspension of sentence for twenty years” in the present case was erroneous not only because it exceeded statutory limits, but also because it indicates a disregard for available sentencing alternatives
  • State v. Hopkins 367 So. 2d 346 La. 1979
    State v. Terrebonne, supra; State v. Mallery, supra.
  • State v. Obleton 365 So. 2d 1105 La. 1978