State v. Anderson
State v. Anderson, 364 So. 2d 566 (La. 1978).
The holding in the court’s own words
Accordingly, we hold that the judgment of conviction against George McClow is vacated and all proceedings in the prosecution against him are abated ab initio.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- State of Louisiana v. Terry Lemaire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Sargent La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
- State of Louisiana v. Ronald Gene McLain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
- State of Louisiana v. Michael Reado, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- State v. Reado 139 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State of Louisiana v. James Bowden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- State v. Bowden 106 So. 3d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State v. Harvey 644 So. 2d 371 La. 1994
- State Ex Rel. Richey v. Butler 572 So. 2d 1043 La. 1991
- State v. Burge 486 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Strong 463 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. James 459 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Morris 328 So. 2d 65
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. Defendants West and Diana Anderson were each indicted for two counts of distribution of heroin. Defendant George McClow was indicted for a single count of distribution of heroin. On March 18, 1976, the three defendants were jointly tried before a twelve person jury which found each defendant guilty as charged. Defendants West and Diana Anderson each received two life sentences at hard labor to run concurrently. Defendant George McClow also received the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment at hard labor pursuant to La. R.S. 40:966. We are advised that defendant McClow died while the present appeal was pending. Accordingly, we hold that the judgment of conviction against George McClow is vacated and all proceedings in the prosecution against him are abated ab initio. See, State v. Morris, 328 So.2d 65 (La.1976). Defendants West and Diana Anderson rely upon four assignments of error for reversal of their convictions and sentences. We have reviewed the record and find no merit in defendants’ assignments of error. Accordingly, we affirm their convictions and sentences.