Sittig v. Littell
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 2, 1962 140 So. 2d 406; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 14, 1930 129 So. 436; La., May 15, 1868 20 La. 357; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., June 4, 1962 142 So. 2d 605
Sittig v. Littell, 21 La. Ann. 646 (1869).
Cited by
- Comire v. Schiro Amusement Co. 6 La. App. 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1927
- McCutchen v. Hudson 61 So. 157 La. 1913
- Chicago-Texas Land & Lumber Co. v. Sabine River Lumber Co. 57 So. 1003 La. 1912
Opinion text
Howell, J. In this case judgment in solido was obtained against the two makers and the indorser of a promissory note, from which the two makers took this appeal by petition and asked that the plaintiff be cited. It is manifest that the indorser has an interest and should be a party to the appeal, and as this court will notice, of its own motion, the want of proper parties, the appeal must be dismissed. 12 R. 203 ; 4 A. 577 ; 11 A. 409 ; 12 A. 755 , 774, 801; 3 A. 317 ; 19 A. 137 . It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed with costs.