State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hoyt
Also decided on this docket: La., January 15, 1881 33 La. Ann. 32; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., October 9, 1974 301 So. 2d 427; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 12, 1965 174 So. 2d 915
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hoyt, 357 So. 2d 1189 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978).
Cited by
- State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bitterwolf 401 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hoyt 359 So. 2d 621 La. 1978
Opinion text
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. At footnote 1 of the opinión herein we stated, “The Department of Highways told their appraisers not to consider severance damages.” This statement may not be fully and technically accurate. As pointed out in the Department’s application for rehearing, its appraisers were instructed that “under present law severance damage, as a result of making a street one-way rather than two-way, was not compensable.” In any event, the Department’s appraisers were obviously of the impression that they were not to consider severance damage in this regard. With these explanatory remarks, the application for rehearing is denied. APPLICATION FOR REHEARING DENIED. '