Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Singleton v. Executive Officers of Atlas Construction Co., 369 So. 2d 699.

90 citing documents.

STATE, DOTD v. Brookhollow of Alexandria 578 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
1990); State, State, State, DOTD v. Chambers Investment Co., Inc., (La.App.
STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Chambers Inv. Co. 576 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
v. Constant, State, D.O.T.D.
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT v. Lobel 571 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State, Dept. of Transp. v. Maynard 565 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
1st Cir.1978), affirmed and amended, , 702 (La.1979).
State, Dept. of Hwys. v. Enserch Corp. 559 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
STATE, DOTD v. Messenger 556 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
STATE, DOTD v. Dietrich 555 So. 2d 1355 La. 1990
STATE, DEPT OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Clark 548 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
STATE, DOTD v. Dietrich 544 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
STATE, DOTD v. Caroline Atkins Crawford Business Trusts 538 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
The State argues on appeal that this award was improper because there was no evidence that these improvements were unique in nature, as is required by State, (La.
State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. v. Traina 537 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Sheridan 517 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Dept. of Transp. & Development v. Ford 520 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
*777 The benchmark Louisiana decision addressing the expropriation of commercial property on which rests ongoing businesses is State
State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development v. Campisi 509 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In awarding such sums, (La.
State, Dept. of Trans. & Dev. v. Sonnier 503 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State, State, , 702 (La.1979); State, Department of Transportation & , 104 (La.App.3d Cir.1985); State, Department of Transportation and Development v. Boyce Gin Cooperative, Inc., State, (
East Baton Rouge Parish v. Hays 498 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANS. & DEVELOPMENT v. Jacob 491 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Under the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, Article I, Section 4 and the Supreme Court case of State of Louisiana, a landowner whose property is expropriated shall be compensated to the full extent of his loss, including any business or economic loss sustained by the property owner.
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. v. Hecker 493 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVEL. v. Chaisson 477 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State, Dept. of Transp. & Development v. Ford 470 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State, Dept. of Transp. & Develop. v. Henry 468 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Although the Louisiana Supreme Court, awarded a landowner replacement costs, replacement costs as a measure of compensation remain an exception to the general rule.
Missouri Pacific RR Co. v. Nicholson 460 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVEL. v. Manuel 451 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Appeal of Brisset 436 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
App. 1st Cir.1978), as amended and affirmed as amended
State D. of Trans. & Dev. v. Estate of Clark 432 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT v. Tynes 433 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. v. Exxon Corp. 430 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
City of Shreveport v. Standard Printing Co. 427 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Monroe Redevelopment Agency v. Succn.
State v. Ruple 426 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
In re Appeal of Brisset 424 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1st Cir.1978), amended and affirmed as amended, La.
State, Dept. of Highways v. Bitterwolf 415 So. 2d 196 La. 1982
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Becnel 417 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
NOTES [1] Modified on other grounds, .
City of Lafayette v. Delhomme 401 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
In making the award, the court indicated that it was guided by Article 1, Section 4 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, which provides that a landowner "shall be compensated to the full extent of his loss", and by State, which expanded traditional concepts of compensation to landowners in expropriation suits.
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Davis 400 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
the supreme court said: "In view of the constitutional requirement that they be compensated to the full extent of their loss, it is not constitutionally significant that the award to them will exceed the market value of the property used in their business operations.
Monroe Redevelopment Agency v. Succession of Kusin 398 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
City of Lafayette v. Cason 393 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
City of Shreveport v. Bernstein 391 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
City of Shreveport v. Pupillo 390 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
v. Constant, a landowner whose property is expropriated shall be compensated to the full extent of his loss, including business loss.
State v. Ransome 392 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
NOTES [1] In support of this proposition
State, Through Dept. of Highways v. Frabbiele 372 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
I note the recent case of State, through the Department of Highways v. Constant, et al., , (La.1979) in which the Supreme Court increased the award to the landowner and affirmed a trial court award of 25% of the amount of difference as attorneys' fees.