Smith v. Bratsos
Smith v. Bratsos, 12 So. 2d 241 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942).
Cited by
- South Louisiana Bank v. Miller 479 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Warren Refrigerator Co. v. Fosti Midstream Fueling & Service, Inc. 462 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Arenson Intern., Inc. v. Shelving Systems Corp. 369 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
- Abbott v. Temple 73 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
- United Novelty Co. v. Salemi 68 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
- Smith v. Bratsos 12 So. 2d 245 La. 1942
Opinion text
Intervenor challenges the correctness of the following sentence in the opinion rendered in this case, to-wit: "No street number is given in the act as part of the identifying description nor is there mention of the name of the city, parish, or state in which the store was located." The statement is literally correct. There is, however, at the top of the first page of *Page 245 the copy of the chattel mortgage filed in evidence, but not an integral part of this act of mortgage itself, the following: "Ship To: Louis Bratsos (Doing Business as United Cafe Grill) Street No: 1011 Jordan City: Shreveport Parish: Caddo State: Louisiana". This printed and written matter was hidden from view on account of the manner in which the instrument was bound in the record. This accounts for us not having noticed it heretofore. Be this as it may, our opinion of the lack of effectiveness of the chattel mortgage as to third persons has undergone no change since the presence of this data has been called to our attention. It certainly does not form a part of the mortgage itself because that instrument begins below said data. The application for rehearing is denied. *Page 249