DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cole v. Sherrill, 7 So. 2d 205.

21 citing documents.

  • Lacoste v. Crochet 751 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • Marshall v. Beno Truck Equipment, Inc. 481 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Rodriguez v. Traylor 468 So. 2d 1186 La. 1985
  • BONNET, ETC. v. Slaughter 422 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    The theory behind the "inability to pay" (La.App.
  • Burns v. Fernandez 401 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    The theory behind this doctrine was espoused by our learned brothers of the 2d (2d Cir. 1942), wherein it was stated: "It has never been considered good policy to bankrupt one to pay another even though the award granted is not in line with other cases involving the same injuries and might not fully compensate the plaintiff for the injuries he received.
  • Hryhorchuk v. Smith 379 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Guy v. Tonglet 379 So. 2d 744 La. 1980
  • Tarver v. U-Haul Co., Inc. 362 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
  • Davis v. Moore 353 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Nichols v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 254 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Defendants contend, (La.App., 2d Cir. 1942—cert.
  • Hilburn v. Johnson 240 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
    2 Cir. 1942), ; Rollins v. New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc. (La.App.
  • Urk v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 181 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
    404 (Orl.1937); Cole v. Sherrill, La.App., (2nd Cir. 1942, Cert.
  • Welch v. Welch 169 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    App., ; Olano v. Leathers, La.
  • Emmco Insurance Co. v. Ferrara 127 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Cole v. Sherrill, La.App.1942, ; Koob v. Cooperative Cab Co., 1948, 213 La.
  • Sonnier v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 79 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    App., ], the Court quoted from the opinion rendered by the District Judge, as follows: "Neither do we find that the defendant had preempted this intersection.
  • Camp v. Wheeling Pipeline Co. 76 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Co. v. Romero, La.App., (erroneously cited in counsel’s brief as 7 So.2d) ; Cole v. Sherrill, La.App., ; Miller v. Brown, La.App., ; Pierce Co. v. Hutson Sand & Gravel Co., La.App., .
  • Anderson v. Morgan City Canning Co. 73 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    903 , ; Cole v. Sherrill, La.App., .
  • McCollister v. Gatti 64 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    v. Goodwin, La.App., 1947, ; Gulf Insurance Company v. Robins, La.App., 1943, ; Cole v. Sherrill, La.App., 1942, ; Meredith v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., La.App., 1938, 185 So.
  • Meadows v. Preferred Acc. Ins. 49 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    Cole v. Sherrill, La.App., .” I respectfully point out that the petition does not allege “that plaintiff had already entered this intersection”.
  • Gayle v. J. Ray McDermott Co. 34 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., , 210, the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit, said: "Plaintiff was on a right of way street and was not required to anticipate that defendant would enter the intersection when he, plaintiff, was as near to it as he was.
  • Termini v. &198tna Life Ins. Co. 19 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    Cole v. Sherrill, La.App., .