DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Levy v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America, 8 So. 2d 774.

13 citing documents.

  • King v. King 210 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Cir., 1963) which stated: “ * * * In order for an insurance company to deny liability because of a breach of the cooperation clause, the breach must be material and prejudicial.” See also Freyou v. Marquette Casualty Co., La.App., ; Baham v. Stilley, La.App., ; Broussard v. Broussard, La.App., ; Levy v. Indemnity Insurance Co., La.App., .
  • Robnett v. Great American Insurance Co. of NY 187 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
    Co. of North America, , La.App., 2d Cir.1942 (certiorari denied); Valence v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., , La.App., Orleans 1951.
  • Gulf States Utilities Company v. Guidry 183 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Co. of North America, La.App., .
  • Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 171 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
  • Bernard v. Hungerford 157 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    App., ; Levy v. Indemnity Insurance Co., La.App., .
  • Jacobs v. Beck 141 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Co. of North America, La.App., ; Davis v. Teche Lines, 200 La.
  • Lebo v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance 99 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    2 Cir., , certiorari denied; Harrelson v. McCook, La.App.
  • Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 97 So. 2d 389 La. 1957
    Co. of North America, La.App., ; Storey v. Parker, La.App., 13 So.
  • Broussard v. Broussard 84 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    As was held in Levy v. Indemnity Insurance Co., La.App., and cited in State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Land v. Colletti 79 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    676 ; Levy v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America, La.App., .
  • Elba v. Thomas 59 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    As was held in Levy v. Indemnity Insurance Co. [La.App.], and cited in State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Frye v. Joe Gold Pipe & Supply Co. 50 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
    They further argue, in the alternative, , should be followed; and should this not be done, judgment for plaintiff for loss of future income and earnings should not exceed $10,000.00.
  • Brooks v. Airline Motor Coaches 35 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., ; Robinsin v. Fossett, *Page 791 La.App.