DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thomas v. Leonard Truck Lines, 7 So. 2d 753.

13 citing documents.

  • Polmer v. Spencer 256 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Gates v. Hanover Insurance Company 218 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
  • Succession of Robinson 218 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    812 , (1949); Thomas v. Leonard Truck Lines, La.App., (2nd Cir. 1942); Mounger v. Ferrell, La.App., (2nd Cir. 1942).
  • Franks v. City of Alexandria 128 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    In Thomas v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., La.App., , `The tendency now is to pursue a liberal rather than a strict attitude toward ("amendments").
  • Commercial Credit Corporation v. Morris 107 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    App., ; Currie v. Government Employees Ins.
  • Youngblood v. Allstate Insurance Co. 98 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    This principle was followed by this court in Thomas v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., La.App., , wherein it was stated: “Because a person has the right-of-way on a road or street does not vest him with the privilege of going forward regardless of traffic conditions.
  • Russell v. Vance 90 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Thomas v. Leonard Truck Lines, La.App., ; King v. Burris, La.App., .
  • Currie v. Government Employees Insurance Company 90 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    Judge Taliaferro aptly expressed the responsibility of a motorist entering an intersection controlled by traffic signal lights in the case of Thomas v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., La.App.1942, , 755: "Because a person has the right-of-way on a road or street does not vest him with the privilege of going forward regardless of traffic conditions.
  • Laird v. Pan American Cas. Co. 65 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Blashfield’s Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice: ‘ * * * traffic signal lights do not relieve motorist of the general duty to operate his car with a careful and prudent regard for the safety of others, and he cannot ordinarily assume that an intersection is clear simply because of appearance of green traffic signal lights.’ “Judge Taliaferro said, in Thomas v. Leonard Truck Lines, La.App., : ‘Because a person has ' the right of way on a road or street does not vest him with the privilege
  • King v. Burris 57 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    In Thomas v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., La.App., , “The tendency now is to pursue a liberal rather than a strict attitude toward [‘amendments’].
  • Greenwood v. Romby 51 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
    This rule was succinctly and convincingly stated by Judge Taliaferro in Thomas v. Leonard Truck Lines, La.App., , in these words: "Because a person has the right-of-way on a road or street does not vest him with the privilege of going forward regardless of traffic conditions.
  • Seale v. Stephens 29 So. 2d 65 La. 1946
    Thomas v. Leonard Truck Lines, La.App., ; Pool v. Pool, La.App., .
  • State Ex Rel. Riddle v. Jeansonne 13 So. 2d 470 La. 1943
    683 ; and Thomas v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., et al., La.App., .