Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sandfield Oil Gas Co. v. Paul, 7 So. 2d 725.

14 citing documents.

  • Middleton v. Middleton 526 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Brown v. Brown 430 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    379 (La.App.1940); In fact, counsel for Mr. Brown steadfastly contended both in brief and at oral argument that “[w]e do not contend that the judgment making past due alimony [execu-tory] was obtained by fraud or ill practices.” Thus, it is apparent that Mr. Brown’s sole conte
  • Roy v. Griffith 306 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1974
    379 (La.App.1940); ” From our review of Roy v. Griffith, supra, we are satisfied that the Court of Appeal did not consider the implication of the endorsements on the checks of January 11, 1971, and there is nothing in that opinion to explain the circumstances under which the ch
  • Royal Furniture Co. of Baton Rouge v. Benton 242 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Pertuit v. LeBlanc 216 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    1010 ; Sandfield Oil & Gas Co., ; and Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company, Inc. et al., La.App., ), able counsel for Mr. Pertuit extracts two requirements for the application of C.C.P.
  • St. Mary v. St. Mary 175 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    2 Cir., , concerned an annulment of a judgment rendered upon confirmation of default more than five years after the last step taken in prosecution of the suit.
  • Gumina v. Dupas 159 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    App., ; Vinson v. Picolo, La.
  • Pfeiffer v. Hemisphere International Corporation 153 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    Co. v. Paul, La.App., ; Bell v. Holdcraft, La.App., 196 So.
  • Burnett v. Tucker 150 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    572 ; and Sandfield Oil & Gas Co. v. Paul, La.App., .
  • Delesdernier v. Delesdernier 95 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    See Sandfield Oil & Gas Co., Inc., v. Paul, La.App., , and the cases cited therein.
  • Green v. Small 79 So. 2d 497 La. 1955
    As stated by the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, in Sandfield Oil & Gas Co., Inc., v. Paul, , “The jurisprudence is unanimous to the effect that defendant can by definite action on his part waive the abandonment * * In brief plaintiff argues that he can attack the judgment rendered in the partition suit collaterally without resorting to a direct action of nullity because the judgment in the partition su
  • Hernandez v. White 64 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    453 ; Sandfield Oil & Gas Co. v. Paul, La.App., ; Sentilles v. Frey Brothers, La.App., 161 So.
  • Evans v. Hamner 24 So. 2d 814 La. 1946
    398 .” All of the decisions which we have cited —and others rendered by this court and some by the courts of appeal — were reviewed in an opinion rendered by the Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit in April 1942, in the case of Sandfield Oil & ; in which case the court of appeal decided the identical question which we are deciding now, and decided it as it is decided in the present case.
  • Evans v. Hamner 24 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    In a case similar in many respects to the one at bar, that is, , 726, we held: "7.