Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Charles, 397 So. 2d 469.

42 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of G. & B. K.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
In State in the Interest of Sapia, (La.
State in the Interest Of La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
See also State in Interest of Sapia, State ex rel.
State In Interest Of G.H. 265 So. 3d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1986), citing State in Interest of Sapia , (La.
State ex rel. G.P. 255 So. 3d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See also State in Interest of Sapia , ; State in Interest of J.M.
State in the Interest of G. P. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See also State in Interest of Sapia, State in Interest of J.M., (La.App.
State in the Interest of Drp, Sp, Jmp, Ip La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
These were the facts in 3, where the child was adjudicated in need of care and placed in a private facility.
State ex rel. D.R.P. 134 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
These were the facts in 3 , where the child was adjudicated in need of care and placed in a private facility.
State ex rel. M.A.A. 897 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Barnes v. Riverwood Apartments Partnership 870 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Co., State v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, 188 La.
State ex rel. L.S. 814 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
which provides, inter alia, that DSS “shall have sole authority over the placements within its resources and Insole authority over the allocation of other available resources within the department for children judicially committed to the department’s custody.” This provision was added to the Children’s Code to comply with the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision in State in the Interest of Sapia
State ex rel. L.C.B. 805 So. 2d 159 La. 2002
In State in the Interest of Sapia, this court interpreted the source provision of this article to mean that once the court assigns custody of a child in need of care to the Department of Health and Human Resources, the predecessor of the Department of Social Services, the Department has the authority to select the appropriate placement facil
State Ex Rel. Lcb 805 So. 2d 159 La. 2002
In State in the Interest of Sapia, this court interpreted the source provision of this article to mean that once the court assigns custody of a child in need of care to the Department of Health and Human Resources, the predecessor of the Department of Social Services, the Department has the authority to select the appropriate placement facil
State ex rel. T.A. 801 So. 2d 351 La. 2001
J¿PER CURIAM: * In State In Interest of Sapia, this Court held that while a juvenile court “has the authority to place custody of a child adjudged in need of care or supervision in a private facility if it deems such placement to be in the best interest of the child,” the court did not have the authority to order the Department Of Heath and Human R
Bebop's Ice House, Inc. v. City of Sulphur 774 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
1993); State v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, 188 La.
State ex rel. C.J.K. 774 So. 2d 107 La. 2000
Ch.Code art. 672; State in the Interest of Sapia
State Ex Rel. Cjk 774 So. 2d 107 La. 2000
Ch.Code art. 672; State in the Interest of Sapia
State ex rel. T.A. 774 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See also State in the Interest of Sapia
State ex rel. K.D. 730 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
See also State in Interest of Sapia, State in Interest of J.M., (La.App.
Ruiz v. Oniate 713 So. 2d 442 La. 1998
See also State in Interest of Sapia, (La.
State v. Schwehm 713 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State in Interest of Sapia, State in Interest of Wright, (La.App.
Jordan v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd. 712 So. 2d 74 La. 1998
Co., State v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, 188 La.
State, in Interest of Vn 712 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Also of interest is State in the Interest of Sapia, the Supreme Court case on which both of the above cited cases rely.
State, in Interest of Jh 706 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State in Interest of Sapia, (discussion of prior C.J.P.
State in Interest of ST 699 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
See also State in Interest of Sapia, State in Interest of J.M., (La.App.
State ex rel. CH 599 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
If the court determines the children are not being properly cared for, it may remove custody from the Department and place it elsewhere, State in the Interest of Sapia
Johnson & Placke v. Norris 571 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
CC Art. 13; State in Interest of Sapia
State ex rel. R.B. 538 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State in Interest of Sapia
State ex rel. R.U. 534 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
13:1580; State in Interest of Sapia
State, in Interest of Ja 532 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
The Louisiana Supreme Court in State in Interest of Sapia, wrote: C.J.P.
State ex rel. of D.G. 503 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
DYS contends that the court acted without authority based on State in the Interest of Sapia, State in the Interest of J.M., (La.App.
State in Interest of Two Minor Children 499 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Art. 85; State In Interest of Sapia
State in Interest of Ss 499 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
13:1580(C), and State in the Interest of Sapia
State in Interest of JB 499 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
with the DYS and physical custody with her aunt, as well as ordering private therapy for J.B., was violative of prior law enunciated in State in the Interest of Sapia
State ex rel. N.H. 498 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In support of its contention they cite State in the interest of Sapia
State, in Interest of Jm 490 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
The case upon which DYS relies is State in the Interest of Sapia
Stater ex rel. M.M. 490 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Further, such judgment is a violation of the Code of Juvenile Procedure and the Louisiana Revised Statutes as interpreted by our Supreme Court in State In the Interest of Sapia
State, in Interest of Jennifer W. 485 So. 2d 504 La. 1986
13:1580, [1] citing State in the Interest of Sapia
State ex rel. J.B. 485 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
to DYS for the purpose of providing and finding psychotherapy, citing State in the Interest of Sapia, (La.
State ex rel. T.J. 485 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
On appeal the DHHR contends that by ordering it to maintain the status quo the Juvenile Court violated the supreme court ruling made in In the Interest of Sapia, in which, at page 474, the court held: “Thus, unless payment by the Department for children placed in private facilities is authorized by the statutes which follow in that Part (sections 1081-1086 of Title 15), the Department cannot be ordered to pay for such care and treatment.
State v. Balfa 485 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In the Interest of Norton 444 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The question of wherein lies the ultimate authority to place a child adjudged to be in need of care or supervision has been considered by the Louisiana State Supreme Court in, State In Interest of Sapia
Board of Com'rs v. Louisiana Com'n on Ethics 416 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
State in Interest of Sapia