Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. Purkey v. Shea, 375 So. 2d 375.

23 citing documents.

  • Toups v. Koch Gateway Pipeline, Inc. 915 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    "The right to enforce contribution is not complete until payment of the common obligation[.]" Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
  • Cole v. Celotex Corp. 599 So. 2d 1058 La. 1992
    Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., , 377 n. 1 (La.1979), (La.
  • Keith v. Comco Insurance Co. 574 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    Cases such as Thomas v. W & W Clarklift Inc., U.S. Fidelity & Guar.
  • Keith v. Comco Ins. Co. 574 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    Cases such as Thomas v. W & W Clarklift Inc., U.S. Fidelity & Guar.
  • Watts v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. 574 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    art. 1804; Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., (La.App.
  • Davis v. Husqvarna Motor 561 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    Art. 1113; Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
  • Snyder v. Taylor 523 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    For problems relating to contribution, see Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., and Comment, Prescribing Solidarity: Contributing to the Indemnity Dilemma, 41 La.L.R.
  • Howell v. Iacona 505 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    art. 1795; Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
  • Bergeron v. Amerada Hess Corp. 478 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    4th Cir.1978), rev'd on other grounds Blue Streak Enterprises, Inc. v. Gulf Coast Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Porter 457 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    See Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
  • Owens v. Martin 449 So. 2d 448 La. 1984
    See Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
  • Owens v. Martin 430 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., Richard v. Hebert's Creamery, Inc., (La.App.
  • Ragland v. Viator 426 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    art. 2104; Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, supra .
  • Slocum v. Daigre 424 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    This Comment discusses the recent Supreme Court cases of Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
  • Duplechain v. Clausing MacHine Tools 420 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., (La.
  • US Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. Safeco Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    1111-1116; Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
  • Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 418 So. 2d 575 La. 1982
    1973); Thomas v. W. W. Clarklift, Inc., (Dennis, J., concurring); (La.
  • McIntyre v. Government Emp. Ins. Co. 413 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    See Thomas v. W. W. Clarklift, Inc., Scott v. Behrman, supra; and, Guidry v. Kem Mfg.
  • Matt v. Cox 408 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    4th Cir. 1979); see Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., (La.
  • Johnson v. Alexander 406 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Co., where the supreme court made the following statement with regard to the liability of a master for the negligent acts of his servant: "It is true, of course, as held in Caldwell , that a master's liability with respect to his employee's negligence is secondary or vicarious, and that the employer is not a join
  • Kern v. Travelers Ins. Co. 407 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    Thomas v. W. & W. Clarklift, Inc. and Reliance Insurance Company, held that a vicariously liable employer was a solidary obligor with a concurrently negligent stranger; however, Cox was distinguished.
  • Franklin v. Haughton Timber Co. 377 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    Co., where the supreme court made the following statement with regard to the liability of a master for the negligent acts of his servant: "It is true, of course, as held in Caldwell , that a master's liability with respect to *406 his employee's negligence is secondary or vicarious, and that the employer is not a
  • Foster v. Hampton 381 So. 2d 789 La. 1980
    In Thomas v. W. & W. Clarklift, Inc. and Reliance Insurance Company, a vicariously liable employer was held to be a solidary obligor with a concurrently negligent stranger.