Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. Purkey v. Shea, 375 So. 2d 375.
-
Toups v. Koch Gateway Pipeline, Inc.
915 So. 2d 811
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
"The right to enforce contribution is not complete until payment of the common obligation[.]" Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
-
Cole v. Celotex Corp.
599 So. 2d 1058
La. 1992
Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., , 377 n. 1 (La.1979), (La.
-
Keith v. Comco Insurance Co.
574 So. 2d 1270
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Cases such as Thomas v. W & W Clarklift Inc., U.S. Fidelity & Guar.
-
Keith v. Comco Ins. Co.
574 So. 2d 1270
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Cases such as Thomas v. W & W Clarklift Inc., U.S. Fidelity & Guar.
-
Watts v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.
574 So. 2d 364
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
art. 1804; Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., (La.App.
-
Davis v. Husqvarna Motor
561 So. 2d 847
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Art. 1113; Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
-
Snyder v. Taylor
523 So. 2d 1348
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
For problems relating to contribution, see Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., and Comment, Prescribing Solidarity: Contributing to the Indemnity Dilemma, 41 La.L.R.
-
Howell v. Iacona
505 So. 2d 821
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
art. 1795; Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
-
Bergeron v. Amerada Hess Corp.
478 So. 2d 1308
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
4th Cir.1978), rev'd on other grounds Blue Streak Enterprises, Inc. v. Gulf Coast Marine, Inc., (La.App.
-
Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Porter
457 So. 2d 298
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
See Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
-
Owens v. Martin
449 So. 2d 448
La. 1984
See Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
-
Owens v. Martin
430 So. 2d 1248
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., Richard v. Hebert's Creamery, Inc., (La.App.
-
Ragland v. Viator
426 So. 2d 231
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
art. 2104; Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, supra .
-
Slocum v. Daigre
424 So. 2d 1074
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
This Comment discusses the recent Supreme Court cases of Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
-
Duplechain v. Clausing MacHine Tools
420 So. 2d 720
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., (La.
-
US Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. Safeco Ins. Co.
420 So. 2d 484
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1111-1116; Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
-
Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co.
418 So. 2d 575
La. 1982
1973); Thomas v. W. W. Clarklift, Inc., (Dennis, J., concurring); (La.
-
McIntyre v. Government Emp. Ins. Co.
413 So. 2d 174
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
See Thomas v. W. W. Clarklift, Inc., Scott v. Behrman, supra; and, Guidry v. Kem Mfg.
-
Matt v. Cox
408 So. 2d 389
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
4th Cir. 1979); see Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., (La.
-
Johnson v. Alexander
406 So. 2d 1378
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Co., where the supreme court made the following statement with regard to the liability of a master for the negligent acts of his servant: "It is true, of course, as held in Caldwell , that a master's liability with respect to his employee's negligence is secondary or vicarious, and that the employer is not a join
-
Kern v. Travelers Ins. Co.
407 So. 2d 2
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Thomas v. W. & W. Clarklift, Inc. and Reliance Insurance Company, held that a vicariously liable employer was a solidary obligor with a concurrently negligent stranger; however, Cox was distinguished.
-
Franklin v. Haughton Timber Co.
377 So. 2d 400
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Co., where the supreme court made the following statement with regard to the liability of a master for the negligent acts of his servant: "It is true, of course, as held in Caldwell , that a master's liability with respect to *406 his employee's negligence is secondary or vicarious, and that the employer is not a
-
Foster v. Hampton
381 So. 2d 789
La. 1980
In Thomas v. W. & W. Clarklift, Inc. and Reliance Insurance Company, a vicariously liable employer was held to be a solidary obligor with a concurrently negligent stranger.