Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dinwiddie v. Cox, 9 So. 2d 68.
-
Tupper v. CATL Operating Co.
580 So. 2d 1050
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Dinwiddie v. Cox et al, La.App., .
- Phillips v. Parker 469 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- Bickham v. Brumfield 345 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
-
Collins v. Slocum
317 So. 2d 672
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
App. 1 Cir. 1962); (La.App.
- Elflein v. Graham 307 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
-
Oliver v. Milliken & Farwell, Inc.
290 So. 2d 738
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
See Dinwiddie v. Cox [La.App.], , 2d Cir. 1942; Wells v. Blackman, 46 So.
- Thibodeaux v. Quebodeaux 282 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
-
Bailey v. American Marine & General Insurance
185 So. 2d 214
La. 1966
316 , ; Dinwiddie v. Cox, La.App., .
- Union Producing Co. v. Placid Oil Co. 178 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
-
Watkins v. Zeigler
147 So. 2d 435
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
2d Cir., 1942, (writs denied); LaFleur v. Fontenot, La.
-
Succession of Seals
142 So. 2d 629
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
App., (2d Cir.1942); La Fleur et al. v. Fontenot et al., La.App., (1st Cir. 1957) ; Holley et al. v. Lockett et al., La.App., (2d Cir. 1961) ; LSA-C.C.
-
Holley v. Lockett
126 So. 2d 814
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
2 Cir., 1942, certiorari refused; La Fleur et al. v. Fontenot, La.App.
-
Boyet v. Perryman
123 So. 2d 79
La. 1960
See Arnold v. Sun Oil Co., supra (citing approvingly Dinwiddie v. Cox, La.App., ), and Richardson & Bass v. Board of Levee Commissioners, 226 La.
-
Pitre v. Peltier
122 So. 2d 867
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
The cases of Dinwiddie v. Cox, La.App., ; Arnold v. Sun Oil Co., 218 La.
-
Savoia v. Capello
119 So. 2d 113
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Therein we quoted extensively from Dinwiddie v. Cox, La.App., , which case discussed our jurisprudence upon this question with full citations.
-
La Fleur v. Fontenot
93 So. 2d 285
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
The law applicable in this case has been reviewed thoroughly in the case of Dinwiddie v. Cox, La.App., , 71 as well as a citation and discussion of the jurisprudence, and we take the liberty of quoting rather fully from this case as follows: "Under the title `Of the Prescription of Ten Years' appears Article 3479 of the [LSA] Civil Code, which reads as follows: "`To acquire the ownership of immovables by the species of
-
Martin v. Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co.
81 So. 2d 852
La. 1955
900 ; Dinwiddie v. Cox, La.App., , certiorari refused June 29, 1942; see, also, Juneau v. Laborde, 219 La.
-
Richardson & Bass v. Board of Levee Commissioners
77 So. 2d 32
La. 1954
50 , , we quoted with approval from Dinwiddie v. Cox, La.App., , on the question of the legal good faith necessary for a purchaser to avail himself of the ten years prescription acquirendi causa, as follows: "It is true, as contended, no one is required to examine the public records to determine the validity of title to real property he contemplates purchasing as a condition prec
- Juneau v. Laborde 54 So. 2d 325 La. 1951
-
Arnold v. Sun Oil Co.
48 So. 2d 369
La. 1949
[38] , 71, another decision of the same Court of Appeal, in which we denied certiorari on June 29, 1942, the court held that a purchaser of land from an heir, with knowledge that the ancestor had left other heirs, who, after discovering that the other heirs were dead, did not more thoroughly investigate the family history
-
Brown v. Johnson
11 So. 2d 713
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Dinwiddie v. Cox et al., La.App., .