Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Northcott v. Livingood, 10 So. 2d 401.
- Distinguished Succession of Harrison 183 So. 3d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
- Carter v. Carter 538 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Succession of Amos 422 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
-
Succession of Palermo
359 So. 2d 1040
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
233 ; Basco v. Central Bank & Trust Company, La.App., ; Succession of Grubbs, La.App., ; Bordelon v. Brown, La.App., ; Northcott v. Livingood, La.App., .
- Gathright v. Smith 352 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
- Broussard v. Broussard 340 So. 2d 1309 La. 1976
- Washington v. Sabine State Bank & Trust Co. 328 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
-
Beals v. City National Bank
329 So. 2d 828
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
and Dawson v. Capital Bank & Trust Co.
-
Succession of Zurak
274 So. 2d 861
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
The certificate is the mere evidence that the deposit was made and of the obligation to pay, and an obligation to pay is not corporeal, but incorporeal.” (emphasis ours) (La.App.
-
Dawson v. Capital Bank & Trust Co. of Baton Rouge
261 So. 2d 727
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(2nd La.App.1942), the contest was between Louisiana domicilaries but the court stated as follows: "Rules governing the common-law relation of joint tenancy and tenancy in common have no application to a case of this character arising in this state.
- Basco v. Central Bank & Trust Company 231 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
-
Succession of Grubbs
170 So. 2d 256
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
2 Cir., 1942) , the court said: "A credit in bank is not a corporeal movable and for this reason its transfer to another may not be affected by manual gift."
-
Geo. L. Ducros Tile Co. v. Ruth
137 So. 2d 484
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
1026 , ; Succession of Bendel, La.App., ; LeBlanc v. LeBlanc, La.App., ; Northcott v. Livingood, La.App., .
-
Succession of Shadrick
129 So. 2d 606
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
2d Cir., 1942, , that LSA-R.S.
-
Bordelon v. Brown
84 So. 2d 867
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
App.1942, , in which *869 decisions it was held that an attempted donation inter vivos of a credit in a bank could only be legally recognized when evidenced by an act passed before the notary and two witnesses as prescribed by the LSA-Civil Code Article 1536.