Charles De Greck & Co. v. Murphy & Gairns
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 24, 1966 185 So. 2d 57; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., October 10, 1978 361 So. 2d 971; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., November 21, 1975 319 So. 2d 881
Charles De Greck & Co. v. Murphy & Gairns, 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 94 (La. 1880).
Opinion text
De Blanc, J. In this case a motion is made to dismiss the appeal on the grounds, (1) that the transcript does not contain the record of the succession of Thomas R. Sutton, offered in evidence by the plaintiffs; (2) that the clerk’s certificate is wanting in every legal requisite. The record referred to in appellee’s motion was not copied in the transcript; the certificate of the clerk is but a list and description of documents, and no application was made to have the transcript completed and the error corrected. Appeal dismissed.