Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Watson v. Bondurant, 30 La. Ann. 1.

7 citing documents.

Vautrain v. Neel 163 So. 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1935
City of Shreveport v. Urban Land Co. 159 So. 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
it was held, guoting the syllabus: “No mortgage has any effect as to third persons unless recorded; and save in the single case of the minor’s mortgage on the property of the tutor, every mortgage ceases to have effect, except as to the parties to it, unless rein-scribed in ten years from the date of its original in
Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. Nolan 159 So. 583 La. 1935
Ann. 775 ; ; Miltenberger v. Dubroca, 34 La.
Murff v. Ratcliff 138 So. 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Moseley v. Levy 137 So. 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Oakdale Bank & Trust Co. v. Young 2 La. App. 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Ann. 322 ; Frank Watson vs. Mrs. E. F. Bondurant, .
Edwards v. Fairbanks 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 53 La. 1880
Marr, J., , and proceeded: — In all this litigation our predecessors have maintained, and we think correctly, that the relation between Cavaroc & Son and Fairbanks & Gilman was that of debtor and creditor, under a contract which fixed their respective rights.