No. 66009
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Rosales v. Dixie Mill Supply Co.
Also decided on this docket: La., November 30, 1979 378 So. 2d 436
Rosales v. Dixie Mill Supply Co., 381 So. 2d 825 (La. 1980).
The holding in the court’s own words
* Having considered the record, the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we conclude that the court of appeal’s opinion and judgment, So.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- State v. Coates 509 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State ex rel. Smith v. Maggio 411 So. 2d 1081 La. 1982
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Rosales v. Dixie Mill Supply Co., Inc. 376 So. 2d 179
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. * Having considered the record, the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we conclude that the court of appeal’s opinion and judgment, 376 So.2d 179 are correct and should be affirmed. AFFIRMED. The Honorable EDWARD A. de la HOUSSAYE, III participated in this decision as an Associate Justice Ad Hoc.