No. 66030
Precedential
Processed
State v. Smith
State v. Smith, 381 So. 2d 825 (La. 1980).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Nelson 379 So. 2d 1072
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Defendant has challenged his adjudication as a multiple offender under *826 Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637 , 96 S.Ct. 2253 , 49 L.Ed.2d 108 (1976), claiming that he did not understand the nature of the charge against him in pleading guilty to attempt simple burglary in 1972. He did not state the grounds for his objection in the trial court and we will therefore not consider the question on direct review. La. C.Cr.P. Art. 841. Defendant’s opportunity for review is by application to the trial court for habeas corpus relief. See State v. Nelson, 379 So.2d 1072 (La.1980).