Bituminous Insurance Co. v. Petty
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 4, 1966 185 So. 2d 304; La., April 15, 1877 29 La. Ann. 286
Bituminous Insurance Co. v. Petty, 362 So. 2d 815 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978).
The holding in the court’s own words
1978), our Docket No. 6614, we conclude that the judgment of the district court properly disposes of the issues presented.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- Stacy v. Petty 362 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Stacy v. Petty 362 So. 2d 810
Opinion text
GUIDRY, Judge. For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Gus Stacy, Jr., et al. v. H. D. Petty,. et al., 362 So.2d 810 (La.App.3rd Cir. 1978), our Docket No. 6614, we conclude that the judgment of the district court properly disposes of the issues presented. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed at appellants’ cost. AFFIRMED.