Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bosch v. Girradot, 143 So. 2d 284.
-
Udin v. Levin
273 So. 2d 56
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
In deciding this case, we take note of Bosch v. Bosch, La.App., , in which this Court applied the same basic rules which are alluded to' above but arrived at an opposite result.
-
Dubois v. Falgout
268 So. 2d 70
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
See: Bertrand, supra; (La.App.
-
Odom v. Odom
270 So. 2d 593
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
App. 4th Cir., 1962), ; and Antony v. Antony (La.App.
-
Poole v. Poole
189 So. 2d 75
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
4th Cir., 1962), ; and Antony v. Antony (La.App.
-
Portman v. Portman
181 So. 2d 429
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
4th Cir., 1962), ; and Antony v. Antony (La.App.
-
Morris v. Morris
152 So. 2d 291
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Relying primarily upon Bosch v. Bosch, La.App., , esteemed counsel for appellee argues the trial court erred in concluding appellant has sustained the burden of proof incumbent upon him to establish defendant's alleged adultery by circumstantial evidence showing such conduct to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis except that of appellee's guilt.
-
Hennigan v. Hennigan
151 So. 2d 517
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
This we cannot and should not do in the absence of other circumstances of such a nature as to make the conclusion fairly certain that the parties not only had the opportunity to commit the act but that they went to the place where it allegedly occurred for that purpose and that it was accomplished.” ( ) In Bosch v. Bosch, La.App., (4th cir., 1962) the defendant, living alone, occupied a house and a tenant named Acy occupied a small rear apartment.