Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Superdome Services, Inc. v. State, 381 So. 2d 789.

52 citing documents.

Brittany Nicole Howe, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of Grayson Konrad, a Minor v. Samantha Gafford and the … La. 2024
Taylor v. City of Alexandria 274 So. 3d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Foster v. Hampton , , 790-91 (La.1980).
Sarah Barber v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency Group Self-Insured Fund La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
(2) and represent misinterpretations and misapplications of Civil Code Article 2320 and other laws imposing liability on a master for the offenses and quasi offenses of his servant.
Barber v. La. Mun. Risk Mgmt. Agency 240 So. 3d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
(2) and ; represent misinterpretations and misapplications of Civil Code Article 2320 and other laws imposing liability on a master for the offenses and quasi offenses of his servant.
Moody ex rel. Moody v. Murray 189 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Abels v. General Motors Corp., 39,489 (La.App.2d Cir.04/06/05), , writ denied, 2005-1182, 2005-1193 (La.01/27/06), .
Bergeron v. SMITH & ASSOCIATES D/B/A PRO AUTO RENTALS 986 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Wimberly v. Brown 973 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Abels v. General Motors Corp. 899 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Omsi v. Alvin Joe Elliott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
OMSI v. Elliott 869 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Lucero v. Burney Gear Co. 764 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Following significant rulings of the Louisiana Supreme Court, new Article 1797 was added to the Civil Code in the revision of 1984 recognizing that the obligations of the obligors may arise from different sources yet solida
Doyle v. Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center 624 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1794 and 1797; rehearing denied; Erdey v. American Honda Co., Inc., (La.App.
D'Amico v. City of Baton Rouge 620 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
reversed on other grounds, (La.App.
Parker v. Southern American Ins. Co. 578 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Great SW Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. Companies 557 So. 2d 966 La. 1990
Nall v. Parish of Iberville 542 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Cooley v. State 533 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
1977), after remand, (La.
Snyder v. Taylor 523 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
For problems relating to contribution, see Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc., and Comment, Prescribing Solidarity: Contributing to the Indemnity Dilemma, 41 La.L.R.
Givens v. Prof. Nurses Home Health Serv. 516 So. 2d 120 La. 1987
Givens v. Professional Nurses Home Health Services Inc. 518 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
the Supreme Court held that when an employee’s actions during his employment create an unreasonable risk of harm to another, any resulting liability is solidary with that of the employer.
Vance v. Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff's Department 483 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Relying on these statements, the Supreme Court in a later decision in the same case, expressly disapproved of our holding in Wambles v. State, supra, insofar as it conflicted with a finding of an employment relationship between a deputy sheriff and the State.
Borne v. Ebasco Services, Inc. 482 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Plaintiff, contends the suit against Ebasco interrupted prescription against LP & L because Ebasco and LP & L were solidary obligors.
Finley v. Bass 478 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Cole v. Mississippi River Bridge Authority 462 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Carona v. State Farm Ins. Co. 458 So. 2d 1275 La. 1984
Perez v. State Farm Ins. Companies 458 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
[2] and Sampay, supra, the courts have held an employer solidarily liable with his employee for the employee's tortious acts occurring during his employment.
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light 433 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Sciortino v. Alfano 435 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Later, Foster added the State as a party defendant, and this led to the second Foster decision
Narcise v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 427 So. 2d 1192 La. 1983
Melancon v. Tassin Amphibious Equipment Corp. 427 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
which held that when a *937 servant's actions during his employment creates an unreasonable risk of harm to another, any resulting liability is solidary with that of his master.
Slocum v. Daigre 424 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
This Comment discusses the recent Supreme Court cases of Thomas v. W & W Clarklift, Inc.
Brodnax v. Cappel 425 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
US Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. Safeco Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 418 So. 2d 575 La. 1982
Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.
Keller v. Rednour 416 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
We have carefully considered appellee’s argument and authorities cited, but find that the authorities which they rely upon have been specifically or impliedly overruled by Sampay v. Morton Salt Company, et al
Erdey v. American Honda Co., Inc. 415 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Brown v. Soupenne 416 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Hryhorchuk v. Smith 412 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Lee v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad 410 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
2091: each would owe the entire amount of the *279 damages and payment by either would discharge the other towards the tort victim creditor
Kern v. Travelers Ins. Co. 407 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Jenkins v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office 402 So. 2d 669 La. 1981
Martinez v. Reynolds 398 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Followed Langlinais v. Guillotte 398 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
which specifically overruled Cox v. Shreveport Packing Company, 213 La.
Cappo v. Vinson Guard Service, Inc. 400 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
art. 2320 Vinson Guard is solidarily liable to the plaintiff with Cooke.
Phillips v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. 400 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Carmouche v. Oubre 394 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
after remand, the court held that a deputy sheriff is an employee of the state and the state is vicariously liable under C.C.
Sampay v. Morton Salt Co. 395 So. 2d 326 La. 1981
We granted writs to consider whether Williams v. Marionneaux, supra , upon which Morton and the First Circuit relied, (La.
Hryhorchuk v. Smith 390 So. 2d 497 La. 1980
Rodrigue v. Breaux 388 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Michaelman v. Amiss 385 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980