State ex rel. Duffel v. Marks
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 12, 1916 13 Tiess. 386; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., October 11, 1966 189 So. 2d 20
State ex rel. Duffel v. Marks, 30 La. Ann. 97 (1878).
Cited by
- In Re Meraux 12 So. 2d 798 La. 1943
- Mansur v. Abraham 164 So. 421 La. 1935
- Mansur v. Abraham 164 So. 421 La. 1935
- Ex Parte Steckler 154 So. 41 La. 1934
- Kelly, Weber & Co. v. F. D. Harvey & Co. 151 So. 201 La. 1933
- Bernadas v. Miller 129 So. 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
- In Re Borie 118 So. 45 La. 1928
- In Re Gem Co. 108 So. 110 La. 1926
Opinion text
On Motion to Dismiss. The opinion of the court was delivered by DeBlanc, J. The transcript, in this case, is a duplicate of the transcript in case No. 6681, and the motion to dismiss the appeal, filed in this duplicate, is — with but a slight difference — the identical motion already passed upon by this court. That difference is simply this: the last day ■of the delay fixed by law for the return of such appeals, occurring on a Sunday, the district attorney pro tempore, apprehending the very objection raised by defendant, caused to be filed in this court, on tho ninth day after the judgment was signed, one of the transcripts herein mentioned; the other transcript was filed on the eleventh, and could not have been filed on the tenth day, which, as admitted, was a Sunday. That both were filed in time is no longer an open question. C. P. 318, 575. 8 L. 223 . 6 R. R. 20. 14 A. 105 . 24 A. 333 . The motion to dismiss is overruled.