No. 6706
Precedential
Remanded
Processed
Zito v. Holt
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 8, 1966 190 So. 2d 529; La., May 15, 1881 33 La. Ann. 801; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., April 15, 1975 311 So. 2d 491
Zito v. Holt, 13 Tiess. 441 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1916).
Opinion text
Per Curiam. This case presents the same questions involved in the case of Maggiore vs. Lochbaum, No. 6705 of our docket, this day decided. For the reasons therein assigned, it is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be reversed, that the plea of prescription be overruled, and the case remanded to the trial Court to be proceeded with according to law. Reversed and remanded.