DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mercer v. Tremont G. Ry. Co., 19 So. 2d 270.

27 citing documents.

  • Jane Doe v. Scott M. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In Mercer v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., (La.App.
  • Doe v. Hawkins 42 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In Mercer v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., (La.
  • Copes v. Copeland Bldg. Supply, Inc. 415 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • Brown v. Southern Ventures Corporation 331 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    2nd Cir. 1939), writ denied January 9, 1940; (La.App.
  • Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 322 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    The trial judge concluded that Mrs. Shelton was a licensee upon her son’s property, Lot No. 2, and, therefore, his duty was to warn her of known dangers only, (La.App.
  • O'Pry v. World Wide Health Studios, Inc. 268 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Simoneaux v. Copolymer Rubber & Chemical Corp. 189 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    2 Cir., , certiorari denied; Mills v. Heidingsfield, La.App.
  • Middleton v. Consolidated Underwriters 185 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    See Alexander v. General Accident Fire and L. Assurance Corporation, La.App., (1957), Potter v. Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, La.App., (1963), and Mercer v. Tremont & G. Ry., La.App., (1944).
  • Kennedy v. Columbia Casualty Co. 174 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Co., La.App., ; 65 C.J.S Verbo Negligence, §§ 43 and 45; 38 Am.Jur., Verbo Negligence, Section 96.
  • Chauvin v. Atlas Insurance Company 166 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    Co., La.App., ; 65 C.J.S.
  • Howard v. Early Chevrolet-Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc. 150 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
    Company, La.App., (2d Cir. 1944) defines "invitee" as follows: "An invitee, by definition, is considered to be one who enters upon the premises of another in answer to a direct or implied invitation.
  • Kenning v. Herrin Transportation Co. 148 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Company, La.App., , from which plaintiff quoted extensively the court distinguished between a “licensee” and an “invitee” as follows: “Another way of making the distinction between these two classes would be to say the purpose of the use of the premises by a licensee is essentially beneficial to himself alone, whereas the use of the pr
  • Potter v. Board of Com'rs of Port of New Orleans 148 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    Co., La.App., ; Mills v. Heidingsfield, La.App., 192 So.
  • Vogt v. Hotard 144 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Co., La.App., ; Gershner v. Gulf Refining Co., La.App., 171 So.
  • Malatesta v. Lowry 130 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    Co., La.App., (certiorari denied), Louisiana Law Review, Vol.
  • Dyer v. Stephens Buick Co. 125 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
    Co., La.App.1944, ; Burdeaux v. Montgomery Ward & Co., La.App.1939, 192 So.
  • Alexander v. General Accident Fire & L. Assur. Corp. 98 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    2 Cir., , certiorari denied; Mills v. Heidingsfield, La.App.
  • Hawayek v. Simmons 91 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Co., La.App., ; Gershner v. Gulf Refining Co., La.App., 171 So.
  • Spurlock v. Boyce-Harvey MacHinery 90 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Co., La.App., , certiorari denied; Gremillion v. American Creosote Works, Inc., La.App., .
  • Carter v. Middleton 76 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Co., La.App., ; Anderson v. London Guarantee & Accident Co., La.App., ; Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, La.App., ; Vallette v. Maison Blanche Co., La.App., ; Piacun v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., .
  • Washington v. T. Smith & Son 68 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Co., La.App., ; a bale of paper falling from a dray, Pizzitola v. Letellier Transfer Co., La.App., 167 So.
  • Taylor v. Baton Rouge Sash & Door Works, Inc. 68 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Co., La.App., : “These broad and general definitions of which we speak define a licensee as being one who enters upon the premises of another in the pursuit or furtherance of his own benefit, convenience, or pleasure.
  • Audubon Ins. Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 68 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    786, 789 , and Mercer v. Tremont, La.App., .
  • Patrick v. T. Smith & Sons, Inc. 56 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
  • New York Underwriters Ins. v. B. H. Prewitt & Sons 55 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Company, La.App., , as follows: “The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is the doctrine invoked in aid of a plaintiff in instances where the occurrence of the accident itself serves to make out a prima facie case o'f negligence on the part of a defendant.
  • Lockwood v. Kennedy 44 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    Co., La.App., , in which case certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, we had occasion to discuss this point at some length.
  • Anderson v. London Guarantee Accident Co. 36 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., , 273, and from our opinion therein we quote as follows: "The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is the doctrine invoked in aid of a plaintiff in instances where the occurrence of the accident itself serves to make out a prima facie case of negligence on the part of a defendant.