Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Phillips, 386 So. 2d 910.

32 citing documents.

King v. King 136 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Adkins v. Adkins, supra; Hutson v. Hutson, supra; Ashworth v. Ashworth, 2011-1270 (La.App.
Katherine Trahan Ashworth v. Larry Leroy Ashworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
La.Civ.Code art. 143 (repealed); Mercer v. Mercer, 95-1257 (La.App.
Ashworth v. Ashworth 86 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Code art. 143 (repealed); Mercer v. Mercer, 95-1257 (La.App.
Jeffery Daniel Smith v. Ginger Lemaire Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Our supreme court has held that the “persistent refusal to engage in sexual union, in the absence of consent or sickness or grave fault may constitute cruel treatment[.]”
Adkins v. Adkins 954 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Mayes, supra ; Jenkins, supra ; Donna G.R.
Currier v. Currier 599 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Though persistent, unreasonable denial of sexual intercourse may constitute cruel treatment, (La.App.
Gitschlag v. Gitschlag 593 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Jergins, 451 So.2d at 1338 .
Dean v. Dean 579 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Shenk v. Shenk 563 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Martin v. Martin 561 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Wheelahan v. Wheelahan 557 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Prattini v. Prattini 543 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Jarman v. Jarman 540 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Van [Von] Bechman v. Van [Von] Bechman
In re the Succession of LaBorde 540 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Lafitte v. Lafitte 535 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Blanchard v. Blanchard 490 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Nowlin v. Nowlin 482 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Broussard v. Broussard 462 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Edelen v. Edelen 457 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Jergins v. Jergins 451 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Bateman v. Larson 452 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Schirrmann v. Schirrmann 436 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Bercier v. Bercier 431 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Taddonio v. Kinney-Taddonio 428 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Dugas v. Dugas 424 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Blackwell v. Blackwell 413 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Quinn v. Quinn 412 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Meche v. Meche 410 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
The Supreme Court, set forth the standards of proof to be met in order that a party may be entitled to a separation on the grounds of abandonment.
Lauro v. Lauro 399 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Dickinson v. Dickinson 399 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
4 Cir.1973), writ refused, (La.App.
Kriger v. Kriger 397 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Turner v. Broussard 386 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980