DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Manley v. Hammons, 20 So. 2d 817.

15 citing documents.

  • Patterson v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance 173 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Kerner v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 172 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    App., ; ; Sewell v. Newton, La.App., 152 So.
  • North River Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co. 132 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    2 Cir., ; Adam v. English, La.App.Orleans, ; Bituminous Fire & Marine Ins.
  • Howard v. Davis 121 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    634 ; Manley v. Hammons, La.App., ; Brown v. Homer-Doyline Bus Lines, La.App., ; Ramsey v. McDaniel, La.App., ; Litton v. Samuel, La.App., ; Peeples v. Dobson, La.App., .
  • Gautreaux v. Faucheaux 105 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1958
    2d 607 ; Emmco Insurance Company v. Savoy, La.App.1954, ; Bituminous Eire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Allen, La.App.1948, ; Manley v. Hammons, La.App.1944, .
  • Oehmichen v. Freeman 97 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    1948, ; Manley v. Hammons, La.App.1944, .
  • Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Wallace 92 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    365 , 370: "The only way or theory upon which negligence of one person may be imputed to another is under that of agency; * * * This court likewise held in Manley v. Hammons, La.App., , that the negligence of a father in the operation of a son’s automobile could not be imputed to the son, who was not concerned with his father’s mission or exercising any control over the operation of the automobile.
  • Sampey v. Martin 80 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Adam v. English, La.App., ; Manley v. Hammons, La.App., ; Honeycutt v. Carver, La.App., .” However, we cannot conclude from the record made up by plaintiffs that there was any negligence on the part of the driver of the truck.
  • Metzler v. Johnson 71 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Co. v. Allen, La.App., , and in Manley v. Hammons, La.App., .
  • Emmco Ins. Co. v. Savoy 71 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    App., ; Honeycutt v. Carver, 1946, La.App., ; Adam v. English, 1945, La.App., ; Manley v. Hammons, 1944, La.App., ; Metzler v. Johnson and Johnson, La.App., .
  • Lee v. Kastner 69 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    We are cited to Manley v. Hammons, La.App., , wherein the evidence showed that the plaintiff was driving her car on the right side of the road but very close to the center of the road, and notwithstanding that there was no obstruction to her view for a distance of some 500 feet, she continued onward without making any effort to get out of the way of an on-comin
  • Distinguished Marks v. Highway Ins. Underwriters 51 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
    The case before us is distinguishable from the Brown case, supra, Manley et al v. Hammons et al, La.App., , and the other cases cited in the Brown opinion, in that Gutherie, the bus driver, saw nothing unusual in the appearance or conduct of the Claunch truck until it suddenly crossed the center line of the highway at a point less than fifty feet in front of him.
  • Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co. 37 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1948
    App., ; Honeycutt v. Carver, La.
  • Hardaway v. Hilburn 34 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., , cited by defendant, plaintiff was charged with contributory negligence for not taking steps to avoid striking an automobile which she observed approaching from an opposite direction 300 feet distant and proceeding at an not excessive rate of speed but on the wrong side of the highway.
  • Brown v. Homer-Doyline Bus Lines 23 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    820, are applicable to the instant case.