White v. Radford Buick, Inc.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 19, 1966 193 So. 2d 282; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 4, 1916 14 Teiss. 112; La., February 15, 1878 30 La. Ann. 339; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., October 22, 1975 314 So. 2d 468
White v. Radford Buick, Inc., 362 So. 2d 1235 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Oldham v. Hoover 140 So. 2d 417
- Ross v. Hatchette 247 So. 2d 399
- Darby v. Travelers Insurance Company 272 So. 2d 798
- Shepard v. Shepard 349 So. 2d 1026
Opinion text
GUIDRY, Judge. MOTION TO REMAND The defendants-appellees, Radford Buick, Inc. and General Motors Corporation, move to remand this suit to the trial court to enable them to traverse the right of the appellant, Dorothy White, to proceed with her appeal in forma pauperis. The motion is unopposed. We remand. The record of this appeal has not yet been lodged with this court. Judgment was rendered in this case on May 22, 1978 in favor of Radford Buick, Inc. and General Motors Corporation and against the plaintiff-appellant, Dorothy White. On July 12, 1978, the appellant, Dorothy White, timely moved for an appeal in forma pauperis, which request was granted by the trial court on that same date. The appellant’s original suit was not filed in forma pauperis, nor had the appellant previously sought a pauper order prior to the time she moved for her appeal. The jurisprudence is well settled that where a devolutive appeal has been taken in forma pauperis without allowing the appel-lee sufficient time in which to traverse the affidavits of poverty, the appellate court may, upon timely application therefor, remand the cause to give the appellee the opportunity to do so. Oldham v. Hoover, 140 So.2d 417 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1962). Under the facts of this case, the appellee has had no opportunity to traverse in the district court, and thus is clearly entitled to an opportunity to do so. Ross v. Hatchett, 247 So.2d 399 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1971); Darby v. Travelers Insurance Company, 272 So.2d 798 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1973); Shepard v. Shepard, 349 So.2d 1026 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1977). The appeal is hereby remanded to the trial court for the purpose of allowing the appellee to traverse the appellant’s right to proceed with her appeal in forma pauperis. APPEAL REMANDED.