Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Woodward v. Barringer, 24 So. 2d 200.

15 citing documents.

  • N-Y Associates, Inc. ex rel. Nicoladis v. St. Charles Parish Police Jury ex rel. Melancon 422 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Becnel v. Montz 384 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., .’ *1017 “It is a well-settled legal principle that no contract can arise unless the parties thereto have consented and agreed to its terms.
  • Dorvin-Huddleston Developments, Inc. v. Connolly 285 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    [5] Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., ; Haney v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App., .
  • Parker v. Rhodes 260 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
  • Fedele v. St. Romain 242 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    App. 438 ; Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., .” In addition to the facts hereinabove set forth, plaintiff also relies on the following circumstances to support his position.
  • Alexander v. Alexander 233 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    438 ; Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., .” The judgment appealed from is affirmed at the cost of appellants.
  • Gross v. Brooks 130 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    438 ; Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., .” In cases such as the one presented here, where the parties are not on an equal footing intellectually and are not dealing at arms length, courts are particularly careful to scrutinize the evidence to be certain that the party with greater knowledge does not take advantage of the ignorance of the other party.
  • Newell v. Rountree Olds-Cadillac Co. 129 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    438 ; Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., .” We find no manifest error in the judgment appealed and, for the reasons assigned, it is accordingly affirmed at plaintiff-appellant’s cost.
  • Johnston v. Bearden 127 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    438 ; Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., ."
  • West v. Carbone 126 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
  • Garcia v. Dulcich 111 So. 2d 309 La. 1959
    438 ; Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., .” Defendant in his answer judicially admits under oath that he paid, no part of the purchase price, and that he was named as a copurchaser in the act of sale by virtue of an agreement between him and Dr. Garcia in which he and his wife would permit the doctor to live with them in the house on the property and furnish
  • E. Levy & Co. v. Shreveport Plumbing Co. 108 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., .” It is a well-settled legal principle that no contract can arise unless the parties thereto have consented and agreed to its terms.
  • McClatchey v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Company 85 So. 2d 6 La. 1955
    438 ; Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., .” This pronouncement was quoted with approval in the case of Buxton v. McKendrick, 223 La.
  • Haney v. Maryland Casualty Co. 74 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., .
  • Sanders v. Sanders 62 So. 2d 284 La. 1952
    438 ; Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., .