Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite White v. Havard, 25 So. 2d 108.
-
Slimer v. White
275 So. 2d 468
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
1958); U. S. Realty Sales of Shreveport v. Rhodes, supra; (La.
-
Gement v. Doby
246 So. 2d 253
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
” The defendant, Doby, on page 11, line 15 of his deposition, filed in evidence as Exhibit P-6, said: “Mr. Gement was to get part of the commission.” However, Mr. Doby denied that there was any agreement as to what the commission should be, and he unilaterally decided it should be $7,500.00.
- Keating v. Lachney 216 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
-
Saturn Realty, Inc. v. Muller
196 So. 2d 321
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1967
Howell v. Thomp *324 son, La.App., ; White v. Havard, La.App., .
-
Rolston v. Buff
130 So. 2d 732
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
"The case of White v. Havard, La.App., , cited in behalf of plaintiff is not analogous to the matter at hand.
-
Veters v. Krushevski
100 So. 2d 93
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Foulks v. Richardson, La.App., ; Womack Agencies, Inc., v. Fisher, La.App., ; Wright v. Monsour, La.App., ; Moore v. Walther, La.App., ; Dew v. Hunter, La.App., ; Lawrence v. Bailey, La.App., ; Isaac v. Dronet, La.App., ; Jeter & Monroe v. Daniels, La.App., ; White v. Havard, La.App., ; Sollie v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co., La.App., 194 So.
-
Wright v. Monsour
86 So. 2d 586
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
the equitable maxim that the principal shall not be permitted to enrich himself at the expense of the agent or broker, whose services have inured to his benefit.” ’ See also the following authorities: Corbitt v. Robinson, La.App.1951, ; Lawrence v. Bailey, La.App.1949, ; U. S. Realty Sales of Shreveport v. Rhodes, La.App.1948, ; White v. Havard, La.App.1946, ; Sollie v. Peoples Bank & Trust Company, La.App.1940, 194 So.
-
Dew v. Hunter
66 So. 2d 400
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
1949, ; U. S. Realty Sales of Shreveport v. Rhodes, La.App.1948, ; White v. Havard, La.App.1946, ; Sollie v. Peoples Bank & Trust Company, La.
-
Corbitt v. Robinson
53 So. 2d 259
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
Another case in which this Court has discussed the applicable authorities is White v. Havard, La.App., .
- Lawrence v. Baley 41 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
-
Howell v. Thompson
38 So. 2d 167
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
App., , justify the District Court's judgment for plaintiff.
-
Moore v. Loe
37 So. 2d 345
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
App., , cited in behalf of plaintiff, is not analogous to the matter at hand.
- Cruse v. Bruscato 28 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
- Jeter Monroe v. Daniels 25 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946