Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite White v. Havard, 25 So. 2d 108.

14 citing documents.

  • Slimer v. White 275 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    1958); U. S. Realty Sales of Shreveport v. Rhodes, supra; (La.
  • Gement v. Doby 246 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    ” The defendant, Doby, on page 11, line 15 of his deposition, filed in evidence as Exhibit P-6, said: “Mr. Gement was to get part of the commission.” However, Mr. Doby denied that there was any agreement as to what the commission should be, and he unilaterally decided it should be $7,500.00.
  • Keating v. Lachney 216 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Saturn Realty, Inc. v. Muller 196 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1967
    Howell v. Thomp *324 son, La.App., ; White v. Havard, La.App., .
  • Rolston v. Buff 130 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    "The case of White v. Havard, La.App., , cited in behalf of plaintiff is not analogous to the matter at hand.
  • Veters v. Krushevski 100 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Foulks v. Richardson, La.App., ; Womack Agencies, Inc., v. Fisher, La.App., ; Wright v. Monsour, La.App., ; Moore v. Walther, La.App., ; Dew v. Hunter, La.App., ; Lawrence v. Bailey, La.App., ; Isaac v. Dronet, La.App., ; Jeter & Monroe v. Daniels, La.App., ; White v. Havard, La.App., ; Sollie v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co., La.App., 194 So.
  • Wright v. Monsour 86 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    the equitable maxim that the principal shall not be permitted to enrich himself at the expense of the agent or broker, whose services have inured to his benefit.” ’ See also the following authorities: Corbitt v. Robinson, La.App.1951, ; Lawrence v. Bailey, La.App.1949, ; U. S. Realty Sales of Shreveport v. Rhodes, La.App.1948, ; White v. Havard, La.App.1946, ; Sollie v. Peoples Bank & Trust Company, La.App.1940, 194 So.
  • Dew v. Hunter 66 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    1949, ; U. S. Realty Sales of Shreveport v. Rhodes, La.App.1948, ; White v. Havard, La.App.1946, ; Sollie v. Peoples Bank & Trust Company, La.
  • Corbitt v. Robinson 53 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
    Another case in which this Court has discussed the applicable authorities is White v. Havard, La.App., .
  • Lawrence v. Baley 41 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
  • Howell v. Thompson 38 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., , justify the District Court's judgment for plaintiff.
  • Moore v. Loe 37 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., , cited in behalf of plaintiff, is not analogous to the matter at hand.
  • Cruse v. Bruscato 28 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • Jeter Monroe v. Daniels 25 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946