Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Starnes v. Police Jury of Rapides Parish, 27 So. 2d 134.

17 citing documents.

Travis West v. Brown Chrysler Dodge Jeep, LLC; FCA US LLC; Federated Service Insurance Company; Reginal Winzer and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
A de novo standard of review is required when an appellate court considers rulings on summary judgment motions, and the appellate court must use the same criteria that governed the trial court’s determination of 4 (La.
Gerald Wayne Mizell and Pamela Mizell Helton v. Bobby Joe Willis and James E. Willis La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
City of Baton Rouge v. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality 172 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Kennedy v. McBride 939 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Charles Kennedy, Jr. v. Gerald E. McBride La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Scramuzza 692 So. 2d 1024 La. 1997
Drachenberg v. Parish of Jefferson 563 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Winn v. Jefferson Davis Parish Police Jury 560 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
We therefore believe Stelly, Robinson, and an earlier Second Circuit case, (La.App.
Board of Commissioners v. Caluda 557 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
IP Timberlands Operating Co. v. De Soto Parish Police Jury 552 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Stelly v. Vermilion Parish Police Jury 482 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Guillory v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 410 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Fore v. Volentine 385 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Robinson v. Beauregard Parish Police Jury 351 So. 2d 113 La. 1977
Herlitz v. City of Baton Rouge 298 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
When defendants relocated a portion of Fifth Street, (La.App.
Distinguished Winn Parish Police Jury v. Austin 216 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
Distinguishable from the instant case is Starnes v. Police Jury of Rapides Parish, La.App., cited by defendant.
Bell v. Tycer 97 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
In the case of Starnes v. Police Jury of Rapides Parish, La.App., , our brethren of the Second Circuit stated what they considered were the requirements necessary for the abandonment of public roads by a public body.