Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., 30 So. 2d 792.
-
James Clifford Arrant v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc. C/W Marvin Jack Barnett, Jr. v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc. …
La. 2015
App. 2d Cir. 1949); spontaneous pneumothorax, see, (La.
- Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc. 535 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
-
McCoy v. Kroger Co.
431 So. 2d 824
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Central Lumber Co., (La.App.
- Miller v. Olinkraft, Inc. 395 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
-
Hall v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
390 So. 2d 948
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Central Lumber Co., (La.App.
-
Henderson v. Core Construction Company
295 So. 2d 874
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
885 , ; Dortch *876 v. Louisiana Central Lumber Company, La.App., ; Jackson v. Travelers' Ins.
- White v. EA Caldwell Contractors, Inc. 276 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
-
Allen v. Freiler Industries, Inc.
246 So. 2d 327
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Central Lumber Company, La.App., .
-
Satterwhite v. Zurich Insurance Company
199 So. 2d 429
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Dortch V. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., .'
-
Griffin v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY
186 So. 2d 349
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
App., ; Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., ; Hill v. J. B. Beaird Corp., La.App., ; Biggs v. Libby-Owens-Ford Glass Co., Inc., La.App., 170 So.
-
Comoletti v. Ideal Cement Company
147 So. 2d 711
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
The court therein further stated that although the Court of Appeal had laid considerable stress on the question of where the perforation occurred, the issue was not relevant and in support of its position the Supreme Court cited Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., , which held that the accident began when the employee first experienced pain.
-
Vidrine v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
137 So. 2d 666
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
See Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., .” There seems to be no argument that plaintiff has tuberculosis and that his condition at the present time is such that he cannot return to gainful employment within the immediate future.
-
Cutno v. Neeb Kearney & Company
112 So. 2d 628
La. 1959
In Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., , the Second Circuit Court of Appeal discussed the notice provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Statute in these'words: “Construction of these provisions should be liberal in favor of the plaintiff; and unless it be clearly proven that because of the delay in giving notice of the accident the rights of the emp
-
Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company
99 So. 2d 811
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
330 ; Hill v. J. B. Beaird Corp., La.App., ; Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., ; Stiles v. International Paper Co., La.App., ; Lampkin v. Kent Piling Co., La.App., ; Sharp Essor Standard Oil Co., La.App., ; Sepulvado v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., ; Kraemer v. Jahncke Services [Inc.], La.App., .
-
Roberson v. Michigan Mutual Liability Company
90 So. 2d 465
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
330 ; Hill v. J. B. Beaird Corp., La.App., ; Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., ; Stiles v. International Paper Co., La.App., ; Lampkin v. Kent Piling Co., La.App., ; Sharp v. Esso Standard Oil Co., La.App., ; Sepulvado v. *470 Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., ; Kraemer v. Jahncke Services, La.App., .
-
Martinez v. Dibert, Bancroft & Ross Co.
85 So. 2d 689
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Counsel for plaintiff, with considerable confidence, relies upon the opinion of the *693 Court of Appeal in Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., , the facts of which to some extent resemble those presented here, particularly in that there the plaintiff suffered “spontaneous pneumothorax” or Collapse.-of the right lung, but there, entirely differently from here, “a pain was suddenly felt from the right shoulder downward” while the employee was “pulling one end
-
Sepulvado v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company
75 So. 2d 529
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
796-797: "It is now well settled that to constitute an accident within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Law in cases where the work of the claimant entails regularly heavy physical effort, it is not necessary that the injury from which disability follows be the result of unusual physical effort.
- Sharp v. Esso Standard Oil Co. 72 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
-
Stringer v. Brown Paper Mill Co.
66 So. 2d 640
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
aper Mill Company, La.App., ; Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; Crier v. Kent Piling Co., La.App., ; Hayes v. Louisiana Long Leaf Lumber Company, La.App., ; Lowery v. W. Horace Williams Co., La.App., ; York v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, La.App., ; Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Company, La.App., ; Hill v. J. B. Beaird Corp., La.App., ; Rutherford v. Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., La.App., ; Cook v. M. J. Walsh Boiler Scaling Company, Inc., La.App., ; Schum v. Marion T.
-
Stokes v. Miller
50 So. 2d 509
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
See Rivero v. Leaveau, La.App., ; Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., ; Jackson v. Travelers Insurance Co., 180 La.
-
Rivero v. Leaveau
45 So. 2d 418
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
The direct question here involved was discussed in the opinion of this Court in Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., , in the course of which Judge Taliaferro made the following observation: "`It is now well settled that to constitute an accident within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Law in cases where the work of the claimant entails regularly heavy physical effort, it is not necessary that the injury from which dis
-
Stiles v. International Paper Co.
39 So. 2d 635
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
App., , 796, in the course of which Judge Taliaferro made the following observation: "It is now well settled that to constitute an accident within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Law in cases where the work of the claimant entails regularly heavy physical effort, it is not necessary that the injury from which disa
- Cain v. Delta Tank Mfg. Co. 34 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948