Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., 30 So. 2d 792.

23 citing documents.

  • James Clifford Arrant v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc. C/W Marvin Jack Barnett, Jr. v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc. … La. 2015
    App. 2d Cir. 1949); spontaneous pneumothorax, see, (La.
  • Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc. 535 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • McCoy v. Kroger Co. 431 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    Central Lumber Co., (La.App.
  • Miller v. Olinkraft, Inc. 395 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Hall v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 390 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    Central Lumber Co., (La.App.
  • Henderson v. Core Construction Company 295 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    885 , ; Dortch *876 v. Louisiana Central Lumber Company, La.App., ; Jackson v. Travelers' Ins.
  • White v. EA Caldwell Contractors, Inc. 276 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • Allen v. Freiler Industries, Inc. 246 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Central Lumber Company, La.App., .
  • Satterwhite v. Zurich Insurance Company 199 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Dortch V. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., .'
  • Griffin v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY 186 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    App., ; Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., ; Hill v. J. B. Beaird Corp., La.App., ; Biggs v. Libby-Owens-Ford Glass Co., Inc., La.App., 170 So.
  • Comoletti v. Ideal Cement Company 147 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    The court therein further stated that although the Court of Appeal had laid considerable stress on the question of where the perforation occurred, the issue was not relevant and in support of its position the Supreme Court cited Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., , which held that the accident began when the employee first experienced pain.
  • Vidrine v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 137 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    See Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., .” There seems to be no argument that plaintiff has tuberculosis and that his condition at the present time is such that he cannot return to gainful employment within the immediate future.
  • Cutno v. Neeb Kearney & Company 112 So. 2d 628 La. 1959
    In Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., , the Second Circuit Court of Appeal discussed the notice provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Statute in these'words: “Construction of these provisions should be liberal in favor of the plaintiff; and unless it be clearly proven that because of the delay in giving notice of the accident the rights of the emp
  • Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company 99 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    330 ; Hill v. J. B. Beaird Corp., La.App., ; Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., ; Stiles v. International Paper Co., La.App., ; Lampkin v. Kent Piling Co., La.App., ; Sharp Essor Standard Oil Co., La.App., ; Sepulvado v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., ; Kraemer v. Jahncke Services [Inc.], La.App., .
  • Roberson v. Michigan Mutual Liability Company 90 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    330 ; Hill v. J. B. Beaird Corp., La.App., ; Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., ; Stiles v. International Paper Co., La.App., ; Lampkin v. Kent Piling Co., La.App., ; Sharp v. Esso Standard Oil Co., La.App., ; Sepulvado v. *470 Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., ; Kraemer v. Jahncke Services, La.App., .
  • Martinez v. Dibert, Bancroft & Ross Co. 85 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Counsel for plaintiff, with considerable confidence, relies upon the opinion of the *693 Court of Appeal in Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., , the facts of which to some extent resemble those presented here, particularly in that there the plaintiff suffered “spontaneous pneumothorax” or Collapse.-of the right lung, but there, entirely differently from here, “a pain was suddenly felt from the right shoulder downward” while the employee was “pulling one end
  • Sepulvado v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company 75 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    796-797: "It is now well settled that to constitute an accident within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Law in cases where the work of the claimant entails regularly heavy physical effort, it is not necessary that the injury from which disability follows be the result of unusual physical effort.
  • Sharp v. Esso Standard Oil Co. 72 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
  • Stringer v. Brown Paper Mill Co. 66 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    aper Mill Company, La.App., ; Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; Crier v. Kent Piling Co., La.App., ; Hayes v. Louisiana Long Leaf Lumber Company, La.App., ; Lowery v. W. Horace Williams Co., La.App., ; York v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, La.App., ; Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Company, La.App., ; Hill v. J. B. Beaird Corp., La.App., ; Rutherford v. Frost Lumber Industries, Inc., La.App., ; Cook v. M. J. Walsh Boiler Scaling Company, Inc., La.App., ; Schum v. Marion T.
  • Stokes v. Miller 50 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    See Rivero v. Leaveau, La.App., ; Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., ; Jackson v. Travelers Insurance Co., 180 La.
  • Rivero v. Leaveau 45 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    The direct question here involved was discussed in the opinion of this Court in Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., La.App., , in the course of which Judge Taliaferro made the following observation: "`It is now well settled that to constitute an accident within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Law in cases where the work of the claimant entails regularly heavy physical effort, it is not necessary that the injury from which dis
  • Stiles v. International Paper Co. 39 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., , 796, in the course of which Judge Taliaferro made the following observation: "It is now well settled that to constitute an accident within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Law in cases where the work of the claimant entails regularly heavy physical effort, it is not necessary that the injury from which disa
  • Cain v. Delta Tank Mfg. Co. 34 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948