DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. Freeman, 31 So. 2d 524.

13 citing documents.

  • Hryhorchuk v. Smith 379 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Henton v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. 364 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
  • Landry v. Martin 353 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
  • Davis v. Moore 353 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Williamson v. Chappell 262 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Coleman v. Argonaut Insurance 187 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    2 Cir., ; Seither v. Poter, La.App.Orl., 194 So.
  • Urk v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 181 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
    denied); Smith v. Freeman, La.App., (2nd Cir. 1947); Landry v. News-Star-World Publishing Corp., La.App., (2nd Cir. 1950); Keith v. Royal Indemnity Co., La.App., (2nd Cir. 1956); Ryan v. All State Ins.
  • Redd v. Bohannon 166 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    2 Cir., ; Seither v. Poter, La.App., Orl., 194 So.
  • Martin v. Sanders 163 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    121 ; Smith v. Freeman, La.App., , the minor is liable for his negligent acts.
  • Coco v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 136 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Art. 1785, Smith v. Freeman, La.App., 2 Cir., .
  • Lacaze v. Horton 100 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    Co., [La.App.,] ; Neyrey v. Maillet, [La.App.,] ; Smith v. Freeman, [La.App.,] ; Landry v. News-Star-World Pub.
  • Fenerty v. Culotta 80 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    2d 286 ; Neyrey v. Maillet, La.App., ; Smith v. Freeman, La.App., ; Landry v. News-Star-World Pub.
  • Jackson Cookie Co. v. Burks 45 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    The basis of plaintiff’s claim ■against the elder Burks is that the failure by the minor to account for the moneys received was in the nature of an offense, quasi-offense or tort under Articles 237 and 2318 of the Civil Code, citing as its principal authority for this contention the recent case of Smith v. Freeman et al., La.App., .