No. 7168
Precedential
Processed
Rogal v. Mullen
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., June 29, 1979 372 So. 2d 1266
Rogal v. Mullen, 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 387 (La. 1880).
Opinion text
Spencer, J. Here Is a clear admission that he had let her have the note. She borrowed money on it, and he is bound by her act. His allegation that the note was lost or stolen is manifestly false. The judge below did not believe him, nor do we. Judgment affirmed,.