DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rea v. Dow Motor Co., 36 So. 2d 750.

41 citing documents.

  • Raymond Crowley v. Caesar Rojas d/b/a Rojas Paint La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
  • Assensoh v. Diamond Nails 897 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • Ross v. Oak Manor Farms 769 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • Scariano Bros. v. Backhaus 359 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    which held that suit brought against the owner only in the trade name was sufficient to justify rendition of judgment against the owner.
  • Coleman v. Argonaut Insurance 187 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    377 ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., ; Lynch v. Fisher, La.App., .
  • American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. v. Alongio 169 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    785 ; Rea *590 v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., .
  • Moore v. State 136 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    377 ; reiterated, inter alia, in Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., , and Lynch v. Fisher, La.App., .
  • Lewis v. Quebedeaux 134 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    In the case of Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., , it was held that generally a motorist must see or will be held to have seen all objects sufficiently large to interfere with traffic on his side of the highway within the distance well illumined by the lights of his automobile and he will be excused for not having seen such objects unless the failure be due to lack
  • Ardoin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 133 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    2 Cir., ; Cole v. Burgess, La.App.
  • McNabb v. Canal Insurance Co. 127 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    377; reiterated inter alia, in Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., , and Lynch v. Fisher, La.App., .
  • Walker v. Townsend 127 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Ellis v. Nola Cabs, Inc. 124 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    1031 , ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., .” The District Judge obviously felt that the exception is applicable here.
  • Spears v. Biles 121 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., .
  • Guillory v. Farmers Automobile Insurance 120 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Thus Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., 1948, , was an action where plaintiff traveling at a speed of twenty miles per hour in the rain, ran into a parked military car without lights, which was olive green in color, and a portion of it extended over the pavement; Carter v. Le Blanc Lumber Co., La.App., 1948, , involved a truck loaded with logs moving
  • Byrd v. Elliott 108 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    377 ; reiterated, inter alia, in Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., , and Lynch v. Fisher, La.App., .
  • Malone v. Andrews 91 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    377 ; Dodge v. Bituminous Casualty Corp., La.App., ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., ; Lynch v. Fisher, La.App., ; Buford v. Combs, La.App., ; Lovelace v. Gowan, La.App., ; Washington Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co., La.App., .
  • Noland v. Liberty Mutual Ins. 89 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    1031 , ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., .
  • Suire v. Winters 88 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Also see Cole v. Burgess, La.App., ; Warnick v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., 4 So.-2d 607; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., .
  • Smith v. State 87 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    377 ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., ."
  • Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 86 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    1031 , ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., .
  • Broussard v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co. of Newark 80 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Underwriters, La.App., ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., ; Cole v. Burgess, La.App., ; Watts v. Spikes, La.App., ; Columbia Fire Ins.
  • Sedotal v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 77 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1954
    1031 , ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., ; Buford v. Combs, La.App., .
  • King v. Risdon & WE Holoman Lumber Company 76 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    Thus Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., 1948, , was an action where plaintiff traveling at a speed of twenty miles per hour in the rain, ran into a parked military car without lights, which was olive green in color and a portion of it extended over the pavement; Carter v. Le Blanc Lumber Co., La.App., 1948, , involved a truck loaded with logs moving
  • Fernandez v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 76 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Counsel has cited for our attention for the purpose for disclosing actionable negligence against the driver of the truck, the following cases which we have carefully reviewed but do not find controlling under the facts and circumstances presented herein: Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App.1948, ; Holliday v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, La.App.1949, ; Dodge v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation, 1949, 214 La.
  • Simms v. Lawrence Bros. 72 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    It was so held in Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., ; Columbia Fire Ins.
  • Simms v. Lawrence Bros. 72 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    It was so held in Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., ; Columbia Fire Ins.
  • Wheadon v. Porter 69 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    238 ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., 1948, ; Buford v. Combs, La.App., 1951, .
  • McDowell v. National Sur. Corp. 68 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    377 ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., ; Lynch v. Fisher, La.App., .
  • Dauzat v. Kelone 65 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    377 , and which has been followed by our courts in numerous subsequent cases, among which we mention Murry v. Salley, La.App., ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., ; Vines v. Protective Ind.
  • Nalty v. Nalty 64 So. 2d 216 La. 1953
    785 ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., .
  • Columbia Fire Ins. v. Black 61 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    In the recent case of Rea v. Dow Motor Company, La.App., 1948, , it was observed that the above quoted statutory provisions are ' mandatory, the Court saying: “Peska admits that he did not put out flares when he stopped his unit.
  • Finley v. Guidroz 58 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1952
    1031 , ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., , Buford v. Combs, La.App., , and Evans v. Kirby, La.App., .
  • Huskey v. Maryland Cas. Co. 53 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    377 ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., ; and Lynch v. Fisher, La.App., .
  • Goodwin v. Department of Highways 53 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
    377 ; Rea v. Dow Motor Company, La.App., .
  • Lovelace v. Gowan 52 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    377 ; Rea v. Dow Motor Co., La.App., ; Lynch v. Fisher, La.App., .
  • Buford v. Combs 50 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    1031 , ; Rea v. Dow Motor Company, La.App., ."
  • Lynch v. Fisher 41 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., , our courts have inclined to take into consideration a number of factors, among which may be particularized the locality of the accident, the position of the parked vehicle, the nature of the vehicle, and the operation and effect of lighting equipment.
  • Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co. 40 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., , are authority for the view taken by him and are contrary to the views which we have just expressed.
  • Brothers v. Russell 37 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1948
    App., , the facts of which, in the opinion of this court, eliminated it from the operative effect of the general rule above mentioned.
  • Vines v. Protective Indemnity Co. 37 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., , this court condemned the defendant in damages on the theory that the facts therein made of that case an exception to the general rule.
  • Carter v. Le Blanc Lumber Co. 37 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948