DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Walker v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., 35 So. 2d 610.

15 citing documents.

  • Gipson v. Dresser Industrial Valve Operations 428 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    App. 1st Cir.1958); (La.
  • Seago v. Continental Casualty Co. 294 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    1st Cir. 1958); *915 (La.App.
  • Hobley v. Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Company 233 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
    1st Cir. 1958); (La.App.
  • Mella v. Continental Emsco 189 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    8 , ; Walker v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., .
  • Williams v. Red Barn Chemicals, Inc. 188 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    8 , ], supra, and Walker v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., , that such justification may result from mere words."
  • Deen v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. 180 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    .’ ” “(2) Applying the law cited above, the Court is of the opinion that plaintiff was actually working for the wages paid to him and that the payments made to him were not in lieu of compensation; that agreed stipulation of counsel shows that the wages of plaintiff varied considerably during 1951, 1952, and 1953.” Th
  • Schlekau v. City of New Orleans 133 So. 2d 603 La. 1961
    Co., La.App., ; and Miller v. City of Chicago, 348 Ill.
  • Murray v. Royal Indemnity Co. 94 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1957
    8 , ; Michel v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., ; Walker v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., .’” We deem it advisable to mention the fact that, in his reasons for judgment, the District Judge said that if he had not maintained the plea of prescription he would have had to render judgment in favor of plaintiff since he felt that “the evidence would justify * * * holding” that plaintiff “was totally and permane
  • Scalise v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 84 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    1948, ; Abshire v. Cities Service Refining Corp., La.
  • Barnes v. Ed. Taussig, Inc. 78 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    .’ ” Applying the law cited above, the Court is of the opinion that plaintiff was actually working for the wages paid to him and that the payments made to him were not in lieu of compensation; the agreed stipulation of counsel shows that the wages of plaintiff varied considerably during 1951, 1952, and 1953.
  • Cradeur v. Louisiana Highway Commission 52 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    67 , ; Walker v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., ; Mottet v. Libby-Owens-Ford Glass Co., La.App., ; Abshire v. Cities Service Refining Corp., La.App., .
  • Abshire v. Cities Service Refining Corp. 50 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
  • Elliott v. Heard 46 So. 2d 249 La. 1950
    64 ; Walker v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., .
  • Davis v. Brown's Velvet Dairy Products 43 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
  • Brooks v. G. E. Johnson Lumber Co. 41 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949