DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Peavy v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., 40 So. 2d 505.

13 citing documents.

  • Bateman v. Power Rig Rental Tool Co. 453 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • Faucheux v. Hooker Chemical Corp. 440 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • Murphy v. Employers Mutual Insurance Co. of Warsaw 248 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Carter v. Mann 216 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Legendre v. J. Ray McDermott & Co. 165 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    These are much the same symptoms as mentioned in the cases of Lala v. American Sugar Refining Co., La.App., , and Peavy v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., , and include nightmares, nervousness and headaches, loss of sexual ability, insomnia, diminished appetite, loss of weight and others.
  • Richardson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 157 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Counsel has directed our attention to Peavy v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company, et al., La.App., (2d Cir. 1949); Miller v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, La.App., (2d Cir. 1958); and Webber v. Wofford-Brindley Lumber Company, et al., La.App., (1st Cir. 1959), as being authorities for this court to accept the evidence submitted herein as proof that the employee was suffering
  • Mouton v. Marquette Casualty Co. 109 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    261 , (1943); Vega v. Higgins Industries, Inc., Ladner v. Higgins, Inc., Mamon v. Farnsworth & Chambers Construction Co., Inc., Malbreaux v. Bar
  • Miller v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. 99 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
    Second Circuit, 1949, ; Ladner v. Higgins, Inc. La.App.
  • Jones v. Remington Rand, Inc. 90 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    ecisions on this point, some of which cite numerous cases developing and enunciating this principle, we particularly note Mamon v. Farnsworth & Chambers Construction Co., La.App., ; Tate v. Gullett Gin Co., La.App., ; Dupre v. Wyble, La.App., ; Rutherford v. Frost Lumber Industries, La.App., ; Peavy v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., .
  • Mamon v. Farnsworth & Chambers Construction Co. 86 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    241 ; Peavy v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., ; Lala v. American Sugar Refining Co., La.App., ; Vega v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., ; Clifton v. Glassell-Taylor Co., La.App., ; Porter v. W. Horace Williams Co., La.App., ; McCastle v. Architectural Stone Co., La.
  • Tate v. Gullett Gin Company & Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. 86 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    App. 1 Cir., ; Ladner v. Higgins, La.App., ; Peavy v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company, La.App., ; Lala v. American Sugar Refining Company, La.App., 38 So.
  • Dupre v. Wyble 85 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    261 , ; Ladner v. Higgins, La.App., ; Peavy v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company, La.App., ; Lala v. American Sugar Refining Company, La.App., 38 So.
  • Rutherford v. Frost Lumber Industries, Inc. 57 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    Peavy v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., , and cases cited therein.