Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, 41 So. 2d 783.

14 citing documents.

  • Roy v. Edmonson 221 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
  • Menard v. Allstate Insurance Co. 142 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, (Ct.App., 2 Cir., 1949), .
  • Nicolle v. Roberts 117 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
  • Thompson v. Ferrara 96 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1957
    This section is to be found under title “Definitions and General Authority,” it reads: “ ‘Highway’ includes every way or place of whatever nature open to the use of the public for the purpose of vehicular travel.” Holliday v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., La.App.1949, ; Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of Now York, La.App.1949, .
  • Carlson v. Fidelity Mutual Insurance 88 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Deck v. Page, La.App., ; Prine v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc., La.App., ; Lawrence v. Sansone, La.App., ; Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., .
  • Hayes v. Illinois Central Railroad 83 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    It has repeatedly been held that pleading a conclusion of law that plaintiff is contributorily negligent will not, in the absence of allegations of fact relied upon, entitle the defendant to invoke the defense of contributory negligence; see authorities cited in Parker v. Home Indemnity Co., La.App., , Martin v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., 162 So.
  • Autenreath v. Southern Mercantile Co. 81 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Without making a detailed discussion of the evidence, we are unable to find that plaintiff was negligent in any particular, unless it was his assumption that the defendants’ driver had heard his signal when he had not, in fact, done so.” A very similar factual situation was involved in Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., .
  • Dunnington v. Richard 81 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    *36 See: Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., , Holden v. Rester, La.App., , Service Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. Suezy, La.App., .
  • Prine v. Continental Southern Lines 71 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    That was the holding by this court in the case of Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., , and the principle was also recognized in the case of Lawrence v. Sansone, La.App., .
  • Potomac Ins. v. City of Alexandria 66 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    The following cases cited by plaintiff found negligence by the drivers undertaking left hand turns: Toney v. Burris, La.App., ; Parker v. Home Indemnity Company, La.App., ; Michelli v. Rheem Manufacturing Co., La.
  • Allison v. Turner 61 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    We think the important legal issue herein involved concerns the relation of the last clear chance doctrine to the facts presented by this record: In support of plaintiff’s position, the cases of Parker v. Home Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1949, , and Toney v. Burris, La.App.1950, , are relied upon.
  • Grigsby v. Employers Liability Assur. Corp. 57 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    1947, ; Parker v. Home Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1949, ; Toney v. Burris, La.App.1950, ; and Myers v. Maricelli, La.App.
  • Lobell ex rel. Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Neal 48 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    On the merits, the District Court, under the authority of Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., and authorities therein cited, namely, Ryan v. Louisville, N. O. & T. Ry.
  • World Fire Marine Ins. v. American Auto. Ins. 42 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949