Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, 41 So. 2d 783.
- Roy v. Edmonson 221 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
-
Menard v. Allstate Insurance Co.
142 So. 2d 182
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, (Ct.App., 2 Cir., 1949), .
- Nicolle v. Roberts 117 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
-
Thompson v. Ferrara
96 So. 2d 113
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1957
This section is to be found under title “Definitions and General Authority,” it reads: “ ‘Highway’ includes every way or place of whatever nature open to the use of the public for the purpose of vehicular travel.” Holliday v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., La.App.1949, ; Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of Now York, La.App.1949, .
-
Carlson v. Fidelity Mutual Insurance
88 So. 2d 461
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Deck v. Page, La.App., ; Prine v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc., La.App., ; Lawrence v. Sansone, La.App., ; Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., .
-
Hayes v. Illinois Central Railroad
83 So. 2d 160
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
It has repeatedly been held that pleading a conclusion of law that plaintiff is contributorily negligent will not, in the absence of allegations of fact relied upon, entitle the defendant to invoke the defense of contributory negligence; see authorities cited in Parker v. Home Indemnity Co., La.App., , Martin v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., 162 So.
-
Autenreath v. Southern Mercantile Co.
81 So. 2d 168
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Without making a detailed discussion of the evidence, we are unable to find that plaintiff was negligent in any particular, unless it was his assumption that the defendants’ driver had heard his signal when he had not, in fact, done so.” A very similar factual situation was involved in Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., .
-
Dunnington v. Richard
81 So. 2d 33
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
*36 See: Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., , Holden v. Rester, La.App., , Service Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. Suezy, La.App., .
-
Prine v. Continental Southern Lines
71 So. 2d 716
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
That was the holding by this court in the case of Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., , and the principle was also recognized in the case of Lawrence v. Sansone, La.App., .
-
Potomac Ins. v. City of Alexandria
66 So. 2d 22
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
The following cases cited by plaintiff found negligence by the drivers undertaking left hand turns: Toney v. Burris, La.App., ; Parker v. Home Indemnity Company, La.App., ; Michelli v. Rheem Manufacturing Co., La.
-
Allison v. Turner
61 So. 2d 207
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
We think the important legal issue herein involved concerns the relation of the last clear chance doctrine to the facts presented by this record: In support of plaintiff’s position, the cases of Parker v. Home Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1949, , and Toney v. Burris, La.App.1950, , are relied upon.
-
Grigsby v. Employers Liability Assur. Corp.
57 So. 2d 910
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
1947, ; Parker v. Home Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1949, ; Toney v. Burris, La.App.1950, ; and Myers v. Maricelli, La.App.
-
Lobell ex rel. Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Neal
48 So. 2d 797
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
On the merits, the District Court, under the authority of Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York, La.App., and authorities therein cited, namely, Ryan v. Louisville, N. O. & T. Ry.
- World Fire Marine Ins. v. American Auto. Ins. 42 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949