Sinitiere v. Lavergne
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 4, 1950 43 So. 2d 632; La., May 15, 1879 31 La. 535; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 1, 1968 212 So. 2d 452
Sinitiere v. Lavergne, 381 So. 2d 522 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980).
Cited by
- Maxwell v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. 391 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Sinitiere v. Lavergne 391 So. 2d 821 La. 1980
- Sinitiere v. Lavergne 385 So. 2d 267 La. 1980
- Lavergne v. Department of Development & Transportation 381 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Rue v. State, Dept. of Highways 372 So. 2d 1197
- Brown v. Louisiana Dept. of Highways 373 So. 2d 605
- Bennett v. US Fidelity and Guaranty Co. 376 So. 2d 1269
Opinion text
FORET, Judge, concurring: I reluctantly concur for two reasons: (1) while I find it difficult to vote in favor of the reversal of the trial court, and allow recovery to Gerald Lavergne, a dissent would cause a five-judge re-argument, which I would rather avoid, and (2) for the reason that although I disagree with the case of Rue v. State of Louisiana, Department of Highways, 372 So.2d 1197 (La.1979), we are nevertheless bound by it. With reference to the future of Rue, I note with particular interest our recent case of Brown et al v. Louisiana Department of Highways et al, 373 So.2d 605 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1979), in which the Louisiana Supreme Court at 376 So.2d 1269 , denied a writ of certiorari with two justices voting to grant the writ to “overrule Rue v. State Depart *528 ment of Highways, 372 So.2d 1197 (La.1979)”.