No. 7523 Precedential Denied Processed

Owens v. AAA Contracting Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed August 12, 1968 · 213 So. 2d 338

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 9, 1980 383 So. 2d 108; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 18, 1976 332 So. 2d 554; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 31, 1950 46 So. 2d 920; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 30, 1919 2 Pelt. 359; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 17, 1969 219 So. 2d 226

Cited by

Hough v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 618 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Cobb v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. of Morgan City 527 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Acadian Heritage Realty v. City of Lafayette 451 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Martin v. Martin 228 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969

Opinion text

ELLIS, Judge. Judgment herein in favor of defendant was signed on November 21, 1967, and notice of judgment mailed out the same day. A devolutive appeal was granted plaintiff by order signed on February 20, 1968, and the appeal bond filed on February 23, 1968. The order of appeal was not filed in the record until March 5, 1968. The motion to dismiss is based on the fact that the order of appeal, which was timely signed, was not filed until after the delay for appeal had run. It is undisputed that the bond was timely filed. The applicable provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure read as follows: Article 2088. “The jurisdiction of the trial court over all matters in the case reviewable under the appeal is divested, and that of the appellate court attaches, on the timely filing of the appeal bond, or if no bond is required, on the granting of the order of appeal.” Article 2121. “An appeal is taken by obtaining an order therefor, within the delay allowed, from the court which rendered the judgment. “An order of appeal may be granted on oral motion in open court, on written motion, or on petition.” From the above, it can be seen that, although the timely filing of the bond is sacramental, it is the granting of the order of appeal, within the legal delays, which initiates the appeal proce *339 dure. We do not believe that the failure of the appellant to file the order of appeal, which has been timely obtained, can have the effect of invalidating the appeal, so long as the bond is timely filed, and the order of appeal is eventually filed in the record. The ¿notion to dismiss the appeal is therefore denied, at mover’s cost.