City of New Orleans v. New Orleans & Carrollton Railroad
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., September 2, 1976 337 So. 2d 621; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 5, 1951 50 So. 2d 214; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., May 21, 1980 385 So. 2d 531
City of New Orleans v. New Orleans & Carrollton Railroad, 35 La. Ann. 679 (1883).
Opinion text
Concurring Opinion. ■ Fenner,' J. Without expressing any positive dissent, I prefer not unnecessarily to bind myself by present concurrence in all the broad, and'general interpretations placed upon the Article of the Constitution-relative to retroactive laws. ■ . ' . ,.;. I find a sufficient reason for concurrence in the decree, in the uuiver *689 sal consensus of authority, holding that remedial and curative statutes of the character presented in this case do not violate any general or special prohibition of retroactive legislation.