State ex rel. Pilcher v. Judge of the Fifth District Court
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 10, 1969 220 So. 2d 808; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 15, 1919 2 Pelt. 559; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., May 21, 1980 386 So. 2d 967; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., October 13, 1976 338 So. 2d 961
State ex rel. Pilcher v. Judge of the Fifth District Court, 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 234 (La. 1880).
Opinion text
Spencer, J. It is manifest that in quashing the fi. fa., and discharging the rule the judge did not invade, hinder, or obstruct the jurisdiction of this court. It was an act looking rather to the contrary— to the maintenance rather than to the invasion of our jurisdiction. It is unnecessary to decide what is the effect of the bank’s appeal. It will be time enough to do that when Mrs. Pilcher appeals from the judgment quashing her fi. fa., or when the bank invokes our interposition by prohibition to prevent a disregard of its alleged rights under its appeal. Writ refused.