Burke v. Highway Ins. Underwriters
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 13, 1976 330 So. 2d 366; La., April 15, 1883 35 La. Ann. 553; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., June 25, 1980 385 So. 2d 1273; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 9, 1970 233 So. 2d 305
Burke v. Highway Ins. Underwriters, 51 So. 2d 827 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Marks v. Highway Ins. Underwriters 51 So. 2d 819
Opinion text
KENNON, Judge. For the reasons assigned in Marks v. Highway Ins. Underwriters, La.App., 51 So.2d 819 , the judgment of the District Court in favor of the plaintiff, Mrs. Mamie S. Burke, and against the defendant, R. E. Claunch, is amended to read as follows: Minden Sanitarium bill $ 133.00 Dr. C. M. Baker 131.00 Ambulance 7.50 Pain and suffering of her husband, David Burke 1,500.00 Loss of husband’s support and companionship 4,500.00 $6,272.35 The judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Mrs. Mamie S. Burke, and against the defendant, Highway Insurance Underwriters, is amended to read $2,984.55. In all other respects the judgments in favor of this plaintiff are to remain as written. As amended, the entire judgment is affirmed, with costs of both courts.