Gardsbane v. Horton
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 12, 1980 391 So. 2d 28; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 2, 1969 225 So. 2d 92; La., March 15, 1880 32 La. Ann. 265
Gardsbane v. Horton, 56 So. 2d 859 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952).
Cited by
- Campbell v. American Home Assurance Company 258 So. 2d 81 La. 1972
- Box v. Town of Gonzales 224 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Gardsbane v. Horton 56 So. 2d 858
Opinion text
HARDY, Judge. This is an action by plaintiff as owner of a Hudson automobile for damages sustained to the said vehicle. This is a companion suit consolidated for trial and for purposes of appeal with the suit of Gardsbane v. Horton, La.App., 56 So.2d 858 . It is noted that in written reasons assigned in support of judgment by the District Judge he called attention to the fact that the record did not establish the capacity in which her son was operating her car. As a consequence the judgment entered was one of nonsuit, which we think was proper under the circumstances. The judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost. McINNIS, Judge ad hoc, recused.