Cloud v. Industrial Lbr. Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., April 9, 1963 152 So. 2d 108; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 7, 1927 6 La. App. 572; La., June 15, 1873 25 La. Ann. 522
Cloud v. Industrial Lbr. Co., 135 So. 377 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931).
Cited by
- Nelson v. Kinnebrew 140 So. 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 123 La. 726 not in our corpus
- Schwan v. Peterman 49 So. 486
- Saenger-Ehrlich Enterprises, Inc. v. Stephens 120 So. 778
Opinion text
MOUTON, J. In this case counsel for appellant has made no appearance by brief or oral argument to point out any grounds of complaint. In such cases the judgment of the district court will be affirmed on the presumption of its correctness where it is apparently sustained by the record. Traders Securities Co. v. Heartfield Allen Drug Co., 8 La. App. 518 ; Succession of Suner, 5 La. App. 121 ; Schwan v. Peterman, 123 La. 726 , 49 So. 486 ; Saenger-Ehrlich Enterprise, Inc., v. Stephens, 10 La. App. 188 , 120 So. 778 . In this case, which presents questions of fact, we have, however, gone carefully over the evidence and find that the written opinion of the district judge is fully supported by the record, and have discovered no error to warrant a reversal.