Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Campbell v. A. Lambert & Co., 36 La. Ann. 35.

14 citing documents.

Long v. Foster & Associates, Inc. 136 So. 2d 48 La. 1961
(as modified and limited by Beck v. Fleitas, 37 La.Ann.
Oliver v. Home Service Ice Co. 161 So. 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
It has been held in particular cases that a promisor may withdraw from a contract containing a potesta-tive condition or a nudum pactum at any time (Campbell v. Lambert & Co., , 51 Am.
Cloverland Dairy Products Co. v. Grace 157 So. 393 La. 1934
: “It is well settled that an instrument purporting to represent a continuing contract which only one' of the parties is bound to carry out, for which he has received no price or consideration, and for which the other party has incurred no obligation, is not a valid contract.” In support of its conclusion in the Blanehard-Haber Oase, the court cited the following authorities: , 51 Am.
Chavez v. United Motor Car Co. 151 So. 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
United Carbon Co. v. Interstate Natural Gas Co. 147 So. 37 La. 1933
Shreveport Laundries, Inc. v. Teagle 139 So. 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Nabors Oil Corporation v. Samuels 127 So. 363 La. 1930
957 , and Campbell v. Lambert & Co., , 51 Am.
Blanchard v. Haber 118 So. 117 La. 1928
Douglass v. Burney 3 La. App. 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Campbell vs. Lombert & Co., .
Snell v. Union Sawmill Co. 105 So. 728 La. 1925
Sherer-Gillett Co. v. Bennett 95 So. 777 La. 1923
Tanner v. Eagle Bag Corp. 82 So. 682 La. 1919
Defendant also urges that the contract was a nudum pactum because it did not obligate the plaintiff to receive any part of the shipment, , 51 Am.
Whited & Wheless, Ltd. v. Calhoun 47 So. 415 La. 1908
Union Sawmill Co. v. Lake Lumber Co. 44 So. 1000 La. 1907