Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Messina v. Palmer, 403 So. 2d 63.

16 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. David W. Lupton, III La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Randle James Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
This court has stated, “ ‘[A] sentence founded on an incorrect view of the law should usually be set aside.’ ” State in the Interest of D.B., 14-85 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Delon Quinell Swafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
This court has stated, “ ‘[A] sentence founded on an incorrect view of the law should usually be set aside.’ ” State in the Interest of D.B., 14-85 [p. 16] (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jameel D. Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
This court has stated, “‘[A] sentence founded on an incorrect view of the law should usually be set aside.’ ” State in the Interest of D.B., 14-85 (La.App.
State in the Interest of D B La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
“[A] sentence founded on an incorrect view of the law should usually be set aside.” See also State in the Interest of S.D., 13-1028 (La.App.
State ex rel. D.B. 141 So. 3d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“[A] sentence founded on an incorrect view of the law should *307 usually be set aside.” See also State in the Interest of S.D., 13-1028 (La.App.
State v. Davis 128 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
67(B)(4)(b), a person convicted of distribution of cocaine “shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment at hard labor for not less than two years nor more than thirty years, with the first two years of said sentence being without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence; and may, in addition, be sentenced to pay a fine of not more than fifty thousand dollars.” a trial court had mistakenly looked at the sentencing range for cocaine distribution (two to 30 years) when it should hav
State v. Preston 103 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
the defendant pled guilty to possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and was sentenced to five years in prison.
State v. Culp 17 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v.Spruell, (La.App.
State v. Moore 696 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Defendant alleges that the sentence is therefore founded on an incorrect view of the law and should be set aside
State v. Mims 550 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Dewhirst 527 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Barrose 468 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
There is no minimum sentence.”
State v. Blanchard 450 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court held that defendant’s sentence of five years at hard labor was to be vacated due to the trial court’s mistaken view of the statutorily-authorized penalty, resulting in its unknowing imposition of a relatively stiff sentence rather than a minimal one, and because the trial court's mere ment
State v. Boyette 434 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Cupit 408 So. 2d 1108 La. 1981