No. 81-K-3204
Precedential
Processed
State v. Kennington
State v. Kennington, 407 So. 2d 714 (La. 1981).
Cited by
- Plaquemines Parish v. Delta Development 688 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- Smith v. LOUISIANA HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 637 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
- New Orleans v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. 517 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Opinion text
Re: Helen Kennington, applying for writs of Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus, *715 and Stay Order, parish of St. Tammany, Number 85451. Writ granted. The trial judge is ordered to conduct an in-camera inspection of the District Attorney’s file to determine if any Brady evidence is available relative to assignment of error No. 8, i.e. whether the three persons who did not identify the defendant were able or unable to identify the defendant. It is further ordered that the trial judge conduct a suppression hearing on the motion to suppress the alleged oral inculpatory statement. Otherwise, the writ is denied.